User talk:Wisden17
I am currently: Wisden17's Talk |
 To leave a new message, click here. Please sign all your messages with ~~~~. Alternately, you may email me. I will leave any replies on your talk page. A list of archived topics may be found here.
|
Playfair Cricket Annual[edit]
Hi mate. I only made the most recent edit to the page, which was merely fixing some links to the cricketer Peter May so I'm not the person who made that claim. You're after User:Nigej, he created the Playfair Cricket Annual article and put in the information regarding the 1948 edition/s. Cheers. Crickettragic (talk) 00:36, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Indian Cricket[edit]
Hi, thanks for the offer. I would love to see the obituary sections of the Indian crickets. Please let me know if I can contact you by mail. I have IC80, 83, 85, one or two others before 1993, and all the editions from 1993 to 2004. Tintin 13:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Invitation[edit]
Introducing WikiProject United States Government...[edit] | |||
.svg)
|
Hello Wisden17,
Are you interested in Politics, Law or the United States? Do you enjoy expanding, creating or maintaining articles relating to those subjects? Or do you enjoy the small stuff? Or maybe you like learning about the United States Congress or the Commander in Chief. Well, wait no longer, because we have a project for you! WikiProject United States Government is where all the cool Wikipedians who watch C-SPAN hang out! Join the project today and help us get it off the ground and flying. Thanks in advance, « Diligent Terrier Bot (talk) 22:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
|
Help us get the project off the ground and flying. |
|
Orphaned non-free image (File:Saint Mary's Convent School.gif)[edit]
You've uploaded File:Saint Mary's Convent School.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
GA Sweeps invitation[edit]
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.
We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
I have three questions[edit]
I made an edit today--one edit--to the article Carrie Prejean and have not made an edit to the article in days, but yet another editor reversed my ONE edit and then reported me on the 3RR notice board. I find this to be a clear use of Wikipedia to win a debate about article content and direction. Prejean was called a series of negative things by Perez Hilton, most of the words are contemptuous and vile, such as the b-word and c-word. There are editors that believe that each and every one of Hilton's use of those words MUST be included in the article about Prejean. Now, I don't see the need to have an article about Prejean dominated by the words and comments of ONE individual (highly negative words at that) dominate the life story of Prejean. It is tantamount to having the words of Saddam Hussein concerning George W Bush dominate the Wikipedia article about Bush. It violates Wikipedia avowed goal of NPOV and it violates BLP. Now, I know that consensus in Wikipedia editing is one of the goals, but consensus does NOT override other valid Wikipedia ideals such as BLP. There can be a compromise made where the gist of Hilton's highly negative opinion is included in the article, but at the same time it does NOT dominate the life story of Prejean. Prejean is notable for many, many reasons, not just her public fight with Hilton. She is notable for being a successful model; she is notable for participating in Deal or No Deal; she is notable for being the current Miss California USA; and she is now notable for being a TV personality. My first question is: Can you at least review the article and see if the second, third, fourth, and fifth repetitions of the b-word and c-word violates BLP? I believe that it does. And my second question is: Is it appropriate to make a report on an editor for violating 3RR even though that editor has only made one edit? And my third question is: Is misusing 3RR to win a debate on the proper interpretation of BLP appropriate? I don't think so.--InaMaka (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
Happy Birthday![edit]
|
Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee. |
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolcat64 (talk • contribs) 08:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Ping[edit]
I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 00:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive[edit]
| WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April. |  |
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:27, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Happy Birthday (2010)[edit]
| Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee. |
Armbrust Talk Contribs 00:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)[edit]
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
- Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
- Research: The most recent DR data
- Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
- Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
- DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
- Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
- Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
--The Olive Branch 19:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014[edit]
→ A wizard is never late, Frodo Baggins. Nor is he early; he arrives precisely when he means to!
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.
Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).
MfD nomination of Talk:Lance (Pokémon)[edit]
Talk:Lance (Pokémon), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Lance (Pokémon) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Lance (Pokémon) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Senator2029 “Talk” 21:57, 16 June 2020 (UTC)