User talk:Wisewhip

Speedy deletion of Online Matrimony[edit]

A tag has been placed on Online Matrimony requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 07:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like administrators are in hurry to delete some content instead of validating the presented content. Brief note on Online Matrimony was created at this juncture in the light of recent developments/threats imposed by the outfits. Even after adding sufficient evidence how could the moderators delete the content? Appreciate if you let me know the appeal process and revocation procedure. Wisewhip (talk) 14:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admin NawlinWiki, got to see that you have deleted entry on Bharatmatrimony on 17 April 2007 citing the reason - g11. i have created neutral content on this company similar to Yahoo and Google wiki entries at my user space: user:Wisewhip/Bharatmatrimony. Appreciate if you could take a look at that and clear it for making it a wiki entry. Wisewhip (talk) 09:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It still seems very much like a promotional/advertising piece to me, sorry. You might try Wikipedia:Deletion review. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Muruga-bbc.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Muruga-bbc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:35, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Muruga2003.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Muruga2003.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:35, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Wisewhip/Bharatmatrimony[edit]

User:Wisewhip/Bharatmatrimony, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wisewhip/Bharatmatrimony and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Wisewhip/Bharatmatrimony during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:21, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]