User talk:Wish l

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Johnj1995. I noticed that you recently removed content from Black hair without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The true black hair is only 2% world's population Wish l (talk) 19:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Black hair, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.
Additionally, please note that Quora is not a reliable source.Egsan Bacon (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't make sense to add dark brown hair and true black hair into the same category as "black", there a difference between true black hair and dark brown hair Wish l (talk) 23:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have true black hair and I know what I'm saying, this is unfair Wish l (talk) 23:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are spreading misinformation when reverting my edit Wish l (talk) 23:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Black hair, you may be blocked from editing. Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black hair. Rahio1234 (talk) 12:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is not vandalism, it is the truth and the sources are adequate Wish l (talk) 12:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this as many times as necessary, It's unfair add dark brown and true black hair into the same category as "black" @Rahio1234 Wish l (talk) 12:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide reliable source to added unsourced Rahio1234 (talk) 12:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The brown hair wiki also includes dark brown hair Wish l (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth and Wikipedia:Citing sources. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 22:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

True black hair is rare, it's nosense add dark brown hair and jet black hair in the same category Wish l (talk) 23:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish Wish l (talk) 23:49, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, it is much more accurate to estimate that only 2% of the world have naturally true black hair Wish l (talk) 23:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because true black hair is a uncommon trait caused by black secretion, which indicates that the MC1R gene is activated Wish l (talk) 23:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ScottishFinnishRadish Wish l (talk) 00:00, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When reverting my edit, you are spreading misinformation and preventing people from knowing that black hair is as rare as blonde or red, there's a difference between dark brown hair and jet black hair Wish l (talk) 00:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you understand Wish l (talk) 00:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wish l (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is much more accurate to estimate that only 2% of the world's population has naturally true black hair, since jet black hair is a uncommon trait caused by black secretion, which indicates that the MC1R gene is activated. (I have jet black hair) Wish l (talk) 00:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 05:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.