User talk:Wits

Your edit to Pubic hair[edit]

Your recent edit to Pubic hair (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The BOT revert was mistaken. I attempted to fix a layout problem specific to the firefox web browser. Wits 12:59, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pubes[edit]

Deleted female pic was better - too bad it was deleted it out. --David Shankbone 16:24, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I'm hoping the original uploader of pic will notice deletion, and reinstate it with the proper licensing info. Slim chance, but would be nice.Wits 14:39, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

veg article[edit]

Much better - always good to have specific reference too. I guess they call them weasel words cause they sneak in...Bob98133 (talk) 18:54, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]