User talk:Wizgirl1470

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wizgirl1470, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Wizgirl1470/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 01:11, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Wizgirl1470/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Wizgirl1470/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. creffett (talk) 01:11, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skerrit Bwoy has been accepted[edit]

Skerrit Bwoy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 20:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for assisting Wizgirl1470 (talk) 15:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Nyasia Chane'l (April 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Wizgirl1470/sandbox/Nyasia Chane'l and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Wizgirl1470/sandbox/Nyasia Chane'l, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. I really appreciate the insight. Quick question, I thought that the feature article in the Jamaica Observer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamaica_Observer) would be significant as well as the the Sullivan county democratic. Is there a threshold of readership for acceptable publications? Wizgirl1470 (talk) 02:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wizgirl1470! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 21:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nyasia Chane'l (April 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Nyasia Chane'l may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CUPIDICAE💕 18:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please advise as to what copied text is there? Wizgirl1470 (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, so even if its close and I used something from one of the articles i referenced It is still a violation. I got it. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

Hello Wizgirl1470. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wizgirl1470. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wizgirl1470|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being paid for any of my edits or additions. I do however know the parties I would be happy to declare as such. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 19:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Nu Breed Music Group, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 18:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing again[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Wizgirl1470, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wizgirl1470|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 18:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

am not being paid for any of my edits or additions. I do however know the parties I would be happy to declare as such. I used the template for "Paid Contributions" as that seemed to be the only way to do it. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You stated she's your client, and after looking at your improper disclosure for the company you own/work for, she is also their client. So are you saying you work for free? CUPIDICAE💕 19:29, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being paid monetarily think of it as an internship if that will help explain things better. I am really only attempting to get her wiki page going. I did fill out the disclosure but there doesn't seem to be one for a contributor that isn't paid monetarily. I did use the paid template again however if that would be helpful. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are an intern then you are deemed to be a paid editor here and need to make the required disclosure on your talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 19:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully I addressed the paid contribution requirement in clear and concise language Wizgirl1470 (talk) 21:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nyasia Chane'l (April 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

paid editing has not been addressed yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nyasia Chane'l and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nyasia Chane'l, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will use the paid template again if that would be helpful. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 19:48, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nyasia Chane'l has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nyasia Chane'l. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Theroadislong (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure how to fix that I used the template, I am not sure what I am doing wrong. I understand my error was using the term "Client" I'm endeavoring now to satisfy your inquiry. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 20:47, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully I addressed the paid contribution requirement in clear and concise language Wizgirl1470 (talk) 21:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nyasia Chane'l (April 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

fails WP:NSINGER.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nyasia Chane'l and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nyasia Chane'l, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:06, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so the article in the JA observer a physical newspaper https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/splash/no-stopping-for-nyasia-chane-l_206048 Fails the notoriety test i see. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what the "notoriety test" is and you have STILL not correctly disclosed your paid editing status. Theroadislong (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fails WP:NSINGER. I was referring to this. I was reviewing it and it seemed as if Newspapers were sufficient.

As for the paid contributor status, I am not sure how to fix that I used the template, I am not sure what I am doing wrong. I understand my error was using the term "Client" I'm endeavoring now to satisfy your inquiry. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 20:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The paid editing disclosure needs to be on your user page following the instructions above. Theroadislong (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please advise if i did it correctly. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 21:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please click your (currently red) username to create your user page. You may like to use {{paid}} to provide the required information, but you are not required to use that template. The requirements are described at WP:PAID. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you I think I did it correctly. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 15:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid Contributor[edit]

Wrong page. You're looking for your user page (click your red username) or the draft's talk page, not your user talk page here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Wizgirl1470 (talk) 15:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any association with Uptopclickllc (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)? Star Mississippi 17:01, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no I do not. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 17:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your prompt response. Star Mississippi 17:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you are welcome. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 17:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry but I must say I no longer believe you given the Butler draft and have escalated the query Star Mississippi 18:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused query about what ? I am not sure what the issue is now. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 18:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I just explained to Theroadislong that I had no idea he created an account and attempted to do anything. It was my error for when you asked the question of me. What a mess! Wizgirl1470 (talk) 19:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamlahas excused me of lying and not simply making a mistake i erred in saying no because i didn't know that the account was created. In addition if we were actually trying to some how mislead wiki we could easily have masked the IP addy or hired someone off Fiver to edit the pages. I apologize for not knowing how to navigate wiki correctly and also for my mistake in not knowing an account was created. but to accuse me of spam is unfair and defamatory. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 12:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is a lie that Wizgirl1470 has no connection to Uptopclickllc, as noted over on that user's talk page and as confirmed via technical evidence. Additionally, the paid-editor declaration was nowhere near sufficient. I am going to go block both accounts as checkuser-confirmed spam-only accounts. Enough of this nonsense. --Yamla (talk) 09:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed earlier I had no idea that that account was created when I asked. and as for my declaration I am not sure how it was "Insufficient". the parameters of what to say are not clear. I am not paid to write wiki articles I help my boyfriend from time to time with his work. You are being over critical to people who are new to this community. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 12:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jayson "J-Didda" Butler (April 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Skerrit Bwoy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skerrit Bwoy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skerrit Bwoy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theroadislong (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The references and articles do support the information that was placed. Skerrit Bwoy is a former member of Major Lazer with coverage that supports that fact. And he did leave the group. I know there is an issue as to authenticity due to me being asked about an account that worked on the page. My boyfriend who's company is affiliated with Skerrit Bwoy created the account and edited it and didn't tell me this is why the IP addresses are the same. I really didn't want to cause confusion and we are not trying to mislead the community or the public. He told me that he was simply trying to address the concerns on the page that requested more information, if did something wrong then by all means delete what he did but do not delete the entire page. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 19:33, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wizgirl1470 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a novice to this and I have followed all instructions as to my paid contribution deceleration. I don't think this is fair I have not submitted any false or misleading information. I do not see the problem and I formally request my account to be unblocked. Wizgirl1470 (talk) 12:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That's only a small part of the reason your account was blocked. See your block message. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wizgirl1470 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would need more clarification as to why I am blocked i understand there was an issue with something called "Sock puppet" because my boyfriend opened an account without my knowledge. I have been accused of spam and lying this is very much beyond the pale and it seems to stem from the Yamala person who appears to have some vendetta against me for some reason.

Decline reason:

To have any chance of being unblocked you will need to show that you clearly understand what was wrong with your edits to date (hint: advertising/promotion, misuse of more than one account) and to explain how you would avoid the same mistakes in future and what articles you might be interested in improving. If your only aim is to continue your promotional activities here, you will not be unblocked. Please do not again request an unblock without addressing these points. Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Jayson "J-Didda" Butler[edit]

Hello, Wizgirl1470. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jayson "J-Didda" Butler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jayson "J-Didda" Butler[edit]

Hello, Wizgirl1470. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jayson "J-Didda" Butler".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nyasia Chane'l[edit]

Hello, Wizgirl1470. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nyasia Chane'l, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]