User talk:Wkloot

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Wkloot. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Chris Troutman (talk) 02:15, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wkloot, you are hereby invited to join the Military history WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, theory, and practice. You can add your name to the list of members, browse our showcase, train at the Academy, weigh in at current discussions, read the news, or find an open task. We hope you will join us!

Chris Troutman (talk) 02:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Battle of Tannenberg may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

he believed to be the German right flank. I Corps was ordered to attack the Russian left wing at [[Usdau ( [[Uzdowo]] Poland) on the next day, 25 August. François objected vigorously: only part of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Tannenberg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Marienburg and OHL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of the Vistula River, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages OHL and Battle of Lodz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Second Battle of the Masurian Lakes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Łódź. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Duke Nicholas Nikolaevich of Russia (1856–1929), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gorlice–Tarnów Offensive, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fritz von Lossberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bauer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Georg Bruchmüller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Cambrai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erich Ludendorff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of the Masurian Lakes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Max Hoffmann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Armistice between Russia and the Central Powers[edit]

Can you please reference all of your latest additions? Srnec (talk) 22:53, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page is not a sandbox for working on drafts[edit]

Your user sandbox is here. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:36, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Wkloot. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on German General Staff[edit]

In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template {{PD-notice}} after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence Bragg[edit]

Please be more careful with your edits to Lawrence Bragg, I have undone two already, one removed numerous references and links, another broke a reference called elsewhere in the article. You also seem to be introducing American spelling contrary to WP:ENGVAR. I suggest you make smaller edits, and WP:PREVIEW them to check the effect they have. DuncanHill (talk) 14:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Walther Nernst (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Battle of the Marne, Free energy, Ostwald and Ettinghausen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Wkloot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Spicheren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weissenburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Wörth citations[edit]

Hi: last February you made some edits to Battle of Wörth that included references (using {{sfn}}) to Moltke 1892, Ollier 1873, and Moltke 1907. But there is no target for those citations. Ideally they should be generated by a {{cite book}} or similar (and, I believe, a "ref=harv" parameter to provide a target to match the sfn). Can you take a look?

I came here to put inline footnotes to flesh out the EB1911 citation. It turns out that the article's text is almost entirely lifted from Maude's EB1911 original; see the original June 2003 creation, which still comprises the bulk of the article today. Did Maude copy from Moltke and Ollier, or are you just pointing to parallel descriptions of the battle? David Brooks (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adding: By "Maude" I meant the credited author of the EB1911 article, s:Author:Frederic Natusch Maude. You can see how little the body of the WP article has changed here. Normally I would tag each paragraph with a {{sfn|Maude|1911|p=83x}} but just wanted to know the relationship between the text and your sources. David Brooks (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have come here independently of David Brooks and have the same question (having just added inline citations to EB1911). On 19 February 2019 you made a series of edits to the article Battle of Wörth (diffs). You added a series of short inline citations, but unfortunatly you did not add the support source to the References list at the bottom so we now have in the article a series of short inline citations eg {{snf|Moltke|1892|pp=14-19}} and {{sfn|Ollier|1873|p=27}} Please add the corresponding full citation to the References list at the bottom as has been done for:

In text citation.{{sfn|German General Staff|1881|p=107*}}
References full source {{cite book |author=German General Staff |title=The Franco-German War 1870-71: Part 1; Volume 1 |publisher=Clowes & Sons |location=London |year=1881 |edition=2nd |ref=harv }}

If you do not add the long reference I will revert the edits (Under WP:CHALLENGE) because most of the text is supported by the EB1911 article (see this earwig diff). However I would prefer that your more up to date citations remain in the article so please do it soon. -- PBS (talk) 16:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Western border of Russia in 2014.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Western border of Russia in 2014.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikiacc (¶) 02:58, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WW1 data in 2 bar charts[edit]

Hello,

You have published two bar charts, but there is a lack of transparency as to where the data has come from. Can you provide further details, please

Talk:Recruitment_to_the_British_Army_during_World_War_I#The_data_in_the_chart_created_in_2015,_and_labelled_"British_army_recruiting_1914-1918"

Thanks in advance Keith H99 (talk) 09:56, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]