User talk:Wolfjr100/sandbox

after reviewing your wiki Article you have good sources, from hearing from other classmates it very difficult to find scholarly review everything looks goodHeribertomora (talk) 18:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)heribertoHeribertomora (talk) 18:22, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Josh, I like how you have started editing your article for the Sierra Madre Dam, I would suggest organizing you new content from the exiting content in efforts to better allow for me to find what to peer review with ease. After carefully going back and forth trying to find your new information I noticed that you haven't really added anything new content with the exception of a few sources you have found. In regards to these sources: I noticed they are all from Proquest and based off the citation I get the impression that these are dissertations and theses, something that public users wouldn't have access to verify unless they have a Proquest account and run the risk of having your content be taken off. One of the requirements for posting content on here is that content must not be original research, try to make sure these sources are not mere dissertations or thesis with original research and instead try to find other scholarly content that is not original, e.g. a book with references and anything of such. You seem to be at a good start though. --Salgadoxx8 (talk) 17:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)Salgadoxx8