User talk:WomenProj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

EEAS' Paola Amadei[edit]

Hi WomenProj, are you going to write a article on EEAS's Paola Amadei, too? In case, here are sources: 1, 2. Best, --LH7605 (talk) 15:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes. Will look into it, thank you. --WomenProj (talk) 15:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@LH7605: Also "has a diploma of the College of Europe of Bruges (Belgium)" See how easy it was to mix them up? haha What do you suggest is the best way to disambiguate/diff? Both are diplomats and I'm sure how to name this one: Paolo Amadei (politician), (executive)? --WomenProj (talk) 15:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed a big coincidence. Normally I would go for age, for instance "Paola Amadei (19xx)" but I don't think there is verified information on either of their ages. So maye go for "Paola Amadei (Italian diplomat)" and "Paola Amadei (European diplomat)". Would that be an option? Best, --LH7605 (talk) 20:27, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, not sure. I'll check other examples of similar instances first. --WomenProj (talk) 15:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "WomenProj", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Username implies shared use. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Username implies shared account. See Usernames implying shared use - FlightTime (open channel) 17:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FlightTime:Hi! I mainly work on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's History and Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red hence the username choice. I've read the WP:ISU section you've referred and it doesn't say anything about calling something a project is not acceptable, but I would appreciate it if you could point me to the right direction. Thanks! --WomenProj (talk) 17:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to ping you, @WomenArtistUpdates:, but when I was looking at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red overview and participants, I saw your username and that inspired me a little bit in my username choice. Hope that's okay... --WomenProj (talk) 00:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any problem with your user name. It implies somebody who works on women-related projects. WomenArtistUpdates is someone who updates articles about women artists. Megalibrarygirl is a girl who works in a library who is mega. Chiswick Chap is a chap who lives in Chiswick. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: Thank you, and I certainly hope I get to keep it.--WomenProj (talk) 11:51, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ritchie333: Yes, that is an available assumption if you know the users rational given above, however if you just happen by, an assumption could be "some kind of Women's group" outside the project, which was my assumption. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 19:02, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I came here because I too consider the username less than ideal. 1Veertje (talk) 15:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Myrtle Edwards (politician)[edit]

On 15 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Myrtle Edwards (politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Myrtle Edwards's family objected to Seattle's Gas Works Park being named after her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Myrtle Edwards (politician). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Myrtle Edwards (politician)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Ritchie333 (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kimberly Hammonds[edit]

Information icon Hello, WomenProj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kimberly Hammonds, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, WomenProj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Candi Castleberry-Singleton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kanika Tekriwal[edit]

Information icon Hello, WomenProj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kanika Tekriwal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Julie Sygiel[edit]

Information icon Hello, WomenProj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Julie Sygiel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kimberly Hammonds[edit]

Hello, WomenProj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kimberly Hammonds".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:56, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kanika Tekriwal[edit]

Hello, WomenProj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kanika Tekriwal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ruth Díaz Barrigón[edit]

Information icon Hello, WomenProj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ruth Díaz Barrigón, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ruth Díaz Barrigón[edit]

Hello, WomenProj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ruth Díaz Barrigón".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]