User talk:Woodchuck

A friendly note from User:L: The first person to use this page to make a crappy joke about how much wood woodchucks can chuck is getting their Wikiteeth knocked out of them. It's not Funny. Woodchucks can chuck wood, they just suck at it. End of story!

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Woodchuck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --TeaDrinker 20:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Sinofsky[edit]

Hi Woodchuckk, the main reason why I deleted the content was because of copyright issues. Copying someone's whole resume onto Wikipedia does not comply with Wikipedia non-free content policies, and it probably is not fair use under copyright law either. If you would like to include this same material, you can write the information in your own words. (You can use other websites as a source of information, not as a source of sentences.) Also, the material you added is not the appropriate tone for a Wikipedia article, because it is written by Microsoft, which (understandably) is trying to make Steven Sinofsky look good. (For example, "striving to build the most valued and trusted online community.") Everything on wikipedia must be written in a neutral point of view. If you have any more questions, please ask. Calliopejen1 02:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

:3[edit]

3 is an emoticon. It's sort of like a puppy or a kitten giving a "That's interesting. Ima watch :3' face. It could be worse, I could've done IF YOU MAKE A BAD JOKE ABOUT HOW MUCH WOOD WOODCHUCKS COULD CHUCK I'LL GLOMP-KISS YOU 20:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)\( '3')/ --L-- 20:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SIMagine[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article SIMagine, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of SIMagine. Jfire (talk) 17:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warmongers[edit]

I am sorry, I didn't think of that. I saw that you copyed alread the etymology of the word to the Wiktionary, thanks for that. Dassiebtekreuz (talk) 21:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of SIMagine[edit]

I have nominated SIMagine, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIMagine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jfire (talk) 19:14, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AT Attachment[edit]

Thank you for your edit to the AT Attachment page. However I have reverted your change to the table because the actual name of the standard is really "AT Attachment". It is never spelled out "advanced technology" in any of the spec documents. This is an easy misunderstanding to make, especially given the current name of the page. The page was originally named "AT Attachment" but an editor recently moved it to "advanced technology attachment" without any discussion. I have a rename request pending and there is a discussion of the proposed rename back to "AT Attachment" on the talk page - perhaps you would like to contribute? There hasn't been a lot of input on that issue, except from one user who wanted to rename it to "IDE". Thanks! Jeh (talk) 19:51, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]