User talk:Word69

November 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chicken or the egg, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lowball (poker) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chzz ► 14:58, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I marked your latest article for deletion since it is a complete nonsense. Please do not submit articles like this. If you like, you can improve the article and use notability guidelines for creation.Standard2211 (talk) 14:59, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jessica Weir[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jessica Weir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rotorcowboy (talk) 15:59, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Vejvančický with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Chzz ► 16:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Vejvančický, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Davejohnsan (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Vejvančický. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Davejohnsan (talk) 20:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]