User talk:WordsExpert

Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

♠TomasBat 01:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Cold War Origins

Hello...I like all of the information that you have provided about the origins of the Cold War term. I'm somewhere on the fence about whether this is enough information to have its own article. Is there more that you have? If so, maybe we could make a new article, and put a more brief summary on the main article page, to enhance readability. What do you think? Hires an editor 13:58, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

"punk rock" etymology

• The use of the word "apparently" simply suggested that the example cited was the earliest so far found--leaving open the possibility that there was one still older as yet unidentified. Indeed, as it turns out, the Sanders example was earlier.
• Your defense of the Yale quotation book is well taken, but you misrepresented the citation I restored to. The primary source was not a website, but a history of punk rock from a highly reputable publisher--Wesleyan University Press. Research shows that all the sources are referencing the exact same article--the Taylor history and the interview identify it as 1970; Yale as 1971. I've now also looked at Between Montmartre and the Mudd Club: Popular Music and the Avant-Garde, by Bernard Gendron, and the Creem magazine website, which both identify it as May 1971--clearly the correct date. I've made the necessary edits. Could you provide a page number for the Yale citation?—DCGeist 21:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the page cite--and for leading us to the accurate dates in the first place. The Marsh quote undoubtedly stills needs to be--and is--mentioned. If you're interested in a little of the history, Marsh's usage was almost certainly more influential in popularizing the term--he was already one of the best known rock critics--and ? and the Mysterians, in terms of their sound, are certainly recognized as one of the important garage rock forebears to the later musical style with which the term "punk rock" became associated. However, the Sanders quote is very valuable to have--his band, The Fugs, was a central part of a downtown New York cultural scene in the mid-1960s that was one of the foundations for the Mercer Arts Center/CBGB's scene where punk rock as we know it blossomed in the mid-1970s. So, again, thanks for bringing this information in. Best, Dan.—DCGeist 22:10, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

List of English words of Russian origin

Thank you for the expansion of the List of English words of Russian origin. Please always provide the source of etymological information you are adding. Please also update the individual articles as well, so thet there is no discrepancies between them and this list. `'Míkka 23:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

List of English words of Russian origin.

You don't know what you are talking about.Rusf (talk) 21:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:BRussell.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:BRussell.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:BRussell.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:BRussell.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 16:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)