User talk:Woy23

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of airports in the People's Republic of China, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of airports in the People's Republic of China was changed by Woy23 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870738 on 2011-03-03T09:33:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Lanzarote Airport does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jetstreamer ^Talk 09:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTBROKEN[edit]

Please do not bypass redirects, nothing that is not broken needs fixation per WP:NOTBROKEN. Thanks.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 21:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop fixing redirects in airport and airline articles? You did this again here for Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 18:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming Erfurt-Weimar Airport[edit]

Hello there, please note that your renaming from Erfurt-Weimar into Erfurt you did in several articles is not correct. The WikiProject Aviation/Airline destination lists: Europe is outdated here as the airport has been renamed in 2013 from Erfurt to Erfurt-Weimar (or Erfurt/Weimar). Weimar is not a part of Erfurt (that naming would be indeed left out as the area has only one airport) but an independent city. Therefore the naming of "Erfurt/Weimar" in the charts is correct according to our guidelines (the same goes with Cologne/Bonn, Leeds/Bradford or Dallas/Forth Worth and several other airports around the world). Thanks! --46.244.138.193 (talk) 11:13, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Another note: Your changes from "Karlsruhe/Baden-Baden" to "Bade-Baden/Karlsruhe" are also incorrect. The airports official name is "Karlsruhe/Baden-Baden" as you can see on their official website. We never change an official naming. Please make yourself familiar with our standards before applying outdated or not applicable rules. If you have to change several identical entries, you can take for granted that they are correct and your changes are wrong - its not our first day here. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.244.145.71 (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of airports by IATA code: C may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| CKY || GUCY || [[Conakry International Airport]] (Gbessia Int'l Airport] || [[Conakry]], [[Guinea]] || [[Greenwich Mean Time|UTC±00:00]] ||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of airports by IATA code: F may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| FYV || KFYV || [[Drake Field]] (Fayetteville Executive Airport || [[Fayetteville, Arkansas|Fayetteville]], [[Arkansas]], United

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Format fixes on airport pages[edit]

Hi Woy23. When you're touching up those airport pages, please leave those single spaces after the = signs. People have to put them back in if they want to add something to an infobox item. Thanks for your efforts. Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Woy23. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Woy23. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Woy23. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jahrom Airport (village)[edit]

The article Jahrom Airport (village) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clearly not a village.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --VersaceSpace 🌃 16:20, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]