User talk:Wpdus0525

Welcome!

Hello, Wpdus0525, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Article Peer Review from Howie

The lead is quite good. It is succinct and to the point, I did not feel that any words or phrases were considered “extraneus” in the lead. Just one suggestion for the lead: I feel it would be helpful to simply name the other forms of menstrual hygiene after the last sentence of the lead. (Rather than just in “See also Section”). Hyperlinking each other form to its respective article would help the direct the reader if he/she might want to learn about the other forms. The article also does a good job with fitting pictures in throughout the WikiArticle. I found the bullet point presentation of the content of different subsections effective (e.g. Use -> Advantages, Use -> Access to water and hygiene) but I was unsure if bullet points fit in with the standard of Wikipedia articles. I would like to see a bit more added to the History section, as well as potentially organizing the section into different subsections (e.g. “Models”, “NGOs”, and “Companies”). Statistics on Menstrual Cup usage, such as number of women using them currently (estimated) or amount being produced and sold, or a graph showing the approximate use of menstrual cups by women over time (possibly as compared to other forms). There may be potential in adding a disposal section (just trash? Or… and also the environmental effects of the disposed cup (since environmental benefits to using the cups were included already).Berzzerkerz (talk) 07:35, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review

I believe that the introduction was very informative and a good introduction to the paper. It informs the reader without overloading information. In this article like may others the date and information seem a little dated. Maybe try to make it current with current studies and statistics. For example, the section on the price of the menstrual cup has probably changed and will continue changing so maybe make a note of that in the section. You could say something to the effect of “In November of 2019 the average cost was…” so that people know when the information is from.

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

1. Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
2. We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
3. Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
4. The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
5. We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
6. More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
7. Citation details are important:
   • Be sure to cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
   • Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
   • Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
   • Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
8. We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
9. Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!
10. Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
11. Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:29, 19 November 2019 (UTC)