User talk:Wrathofjames

Katherine Sopka[edit]

Hi Wrathofjames, You added a copyedit template to the article on Katherine Sopka. Could you indicate what, in your view, might be improved? The statement "may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling" is very broad. --Chris Howard (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi, I agree that he has a tendency to disruptive editing. I'm glad somebody else has noticed... Malick78 (talk) 18:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Putin[edit]

I hope you do not mind, but I have moved one of your comments from Greyhood's talk page to the Putin talk page. This issue of the alleged palace needs wider discussion that edit summaries and messages on user talk pages.

By the way, the Daily Telegraph and the BBC are secondary sources, not primary sources. There is no objection to secondary sources being based on primary sources - that is the whole point of wanting to use secondary sources - they evaluate primary sources.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:04, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the relevance, I hope you did not remove it completely, but it makes sense to be an issue on the talk page. As far as primary sources I was referring to the interviewee mentioned in the BBC report as a primary source simply to suggest the the notability of the reference. Wrathofjames (talk) 06:35, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]