User talk:Wwind

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lisu people. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Brian0324 (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Lisu people[edit]

Please refrain from personal attacks and be aware of the Wikipedia policy regarding such behavior. (see WP:ATTACK). Thank you.Brian0324 (talk) 19:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Lisu people. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Brian0324 (talk) 20:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for arbitrarion[edit]

Hi Wwind - I see that you've submitted a request for arbitration. In my view (and I'm not the one who decides these things, just an experienced editor expressing an opinion) this request is very premature and is almost bound to be rejected by the arbitration committee. It sounds as if all that's happened so far is that you and User:Brian0324 have discussed the problem and been unable to reach agreement. From there, I would suggest that your next step should either be a third opinion (in which you ask for a third editor to provide a new perspective on your conflict) or a visit to the mediation cabal (a group of volunteer editors who help people work through conflict). Please let me know if I can be of any help with any of this. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to find the time sometime tonight. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 21:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

shamanism quote altered[edit]

Hello,

Regarding your edit to this quote here, you were actually changing a direct quote. If the quote is wrong, then it should be removed, but it would leave this section lacking about Lisu Shamanistic/Animistic religion.Brian0324 (talk) 15:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Talk:Sarah Palin. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:39, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Sarah Palin. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kelly ^hi! 03:09, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]