User talk:Xanthis
December 2013[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to London Gold Pool may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- id=hNsSttYnmxsC&lpg=PP1&dq=How%20We%20Got%20Here%3A%20The%20'70s.&pg=PA296#v=onepage&q=&f=false}}</ref> The United States, under President Richard Nixon, unilaterally without consultation with
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
January 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Glengarry Glen Ross (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not change other users' comments on article talk pages. In any case, comments on a talk page are not in-line cites necessary for verification. SummerPhD (talk) 23:49, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
- Typical Wikipedia procedure is outlined at WP:BRD. You boldly added the film/IMDb/NYT as sources for your claim. You were reverted. Discussion -- not you restoring the material then discussing it -- should follow. A strong case for asking to remove Chicago while it was being discussed could be made and I would have agreed -- and would agree -- to it. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Reliable sources[edit]
Thank you for your thoughtful comments on the reliable sources message board. I obviously got buried here, but appreciate the many folks who took the time to comment and to think about the issues. Formerly 98 (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Heyo! Regarding the comment in your edit summary, references would be fantastic!!! Please add wherever you can. :-) --Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Zackmann08. Wow, that was quick. Given the lack of references elsewhere in the article, I imagined that nobody would take me up on the offer. OK, I will do so as soon as I get a chance. May I ask, do you have a particular interest or are you just generally in favor of references like a good Wikipedian? ─Xanthis (talk) 06:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- To be clear, I'm not saying that without a reference your addition will be reverted... As you pointed out, that page has almost no references. I am just always in favor of using references. :-) But my interest lie in the realm of firefighting in general. Hope you are well! Ping me with any questions.
- P.S. You may find {{u}} useful in the future. Instead of having to type
[[User:Zackmann08|Zackmann08]]you can just do{{u|Zackmann08}}--Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Xanthis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Xanthis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Xanthis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |