User talk:Ximota

A tag has been placed on Jessy Geurts, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. User: Hdt83 | Talk/Chat 04:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as James Nichols (Murder Suspect), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Coren ^(talk) 04:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Jamesnichols.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jamesnichols.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

~~For more information on using images, see the following pages:~~

Wikipedia:Image use policy

Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

James Nichols (murder suspect)[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article James Nichols (murder suspect), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DraxusD 06:59, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there.

I still think the James Nichols falls short of the criterion, but not fatally so. I've added a {{notability}} tag to the article to bring attention to the problem and give it a little bit of time to be worked on. But as it stands, the article could probably not survive a deletion discussion.

I fear the fact that notability is not temporary weighs against the article. The murder is locally important, and might develop as an exemplar of a problem with racism and the Hmong, but what are the chances, really, that James Nichols ever personally gets significant independent coverage from reliable sources even just two years from now?

Good work, though. Remember, be bold. — Coren ^(talk) 16:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cha_Vang.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cha_Vang.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jamesnichols.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jamesnichols.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]