User talk:Xpctr8

This user may have left Wikipedia. Xpctr8 has not edited Wikipedia since 29 August 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Stevens Transport[edit]

hey how are you--Thewolf12 (talk) 20:59, 29 June 2014 (UTC) not sure what you mean by auto generated I will check again to be sure[reply]

What I meant was that most of the pages are just information pulled from a database. Bloomberg is certainly sufficient to reference data like the CEO's name or number of employees, but it does not indicate the notability of the company. See Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) for details.Brewbot (talk) 21:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Brewbot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 21:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Username concerns[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Brewbot", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it ends with the string "bot". Usernames of that format are reserved for bot accounts that perform automated edits, so your username will create confusion. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Brewbot —C.Fred (talk) 21:21, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I didn't think about the possible confusion when creating the account. Will submit a request for a name change. Brewbot (talk) 21:26, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bass, Berry & Sims[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bass, Berry & Sims requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tchaliburton (talk) 03:19, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your edits. I've added the source references now. Please have a look. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shashikant_Oak — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karyakarta (talk • contribs) 08:06, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Indolent condition[edit]

Saw your proposal for deletion of Indolent condition. In case you wish to go ahead with the deletion, I would strongly suggest that you update the Wikitionary entry with the relevant details on the haematological condition. There is little to distinguish laziness from the nature of the haematological indolent conditions. As a matter of fact, that was the purpose of creating the mentioned article. Inputs requested. Diptanshu^Talk 15:21, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I lack the context to understand what haematological condition you are referring to or how this article is distinct from the definitions at Wiktionary. Either way, I proposed deletion only because I thought the content was a straight dictionary entry and inappropriate for Wikipedia. If there is a diagnosis called "indolent condition", then let's create a full article about it. -Xpctr8 (talk) 20:55, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Kurtzig[edit]

Why are you recommending this for deletion? When I create a page and add too much information at once I am labeled for deletion. When I try to add things a bit at a time I am labeled for deletion. How am I supposed to create anything on wikipedia? Please assist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jklimczak (talk • contribs) 03:16, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Primarily, I flagged it for deletion because most of the article is directly copied from another website, which is a clear copyright violation. If you own the copyright to that content, see WP:DCM for information on granting permission to use it. If you feel that Andy Kurtzig is notable, then you should collect reliable secondary sources and construct an original article in support of that. It may be helpful to begin writing the page in your userspace and to move it over to the encyclopedia when it is roughly complete and well-cited...if you choose to go that route, I will happily review your draft and help you edit.

I know that this can be frustrating and that you are still working on the article, but please understand that Wikipedia has a zero-tolerance policy on copyright violations. -Xpctr8 (talk) 03:40, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A Conspiracy on Jekyll Island[edit]

I added the references. --GleekRicky98a (talk) 01:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Horowitz index may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

index depends on age and usually falls between 350 and 450. A value below 300 is indicative of a [[acute lung injury|moderately severe lung injury]. A value below 200 as a criterion for a [[Acute

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:48, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edit at Hoegh Osaka[edit]

I would greatly appreciate any more additions to the article, it is late at night here and I'm stuck on my Galaxy S5 (hence the typos). Thanks again! EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 03:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Xpctr8. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Xpctr8. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Xpctr8. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]