User talk:Xyzbb1253/Archive 1

Help me (Got helped) Pictogram resolved.svg This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

   Please see User talk:Jeff G.#Young_Wikipedian_Banned_for_Trying_Out_Stuff_In_Their_Sandbox.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 14:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes Done My Talkpage

Talkpage activated

Xyzbb1253 (talk) 03:15, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello, do you know what he means by "strike"? CRamel16 (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC) Hello

My major is Business. What is your major? M.Caban (talk) 05:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Great! Thanks. M.Caban (talk) 06:42, 12 February 2013 (UTC) hii

Thanks but i am not too sure if it is correct and still have a few more to figure out SRampersaud (talk)

The storm was fine. Just that it was a bit cold. Joan Bailey (talk) 01:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, how do you like I/O psychology class so far? Joan Bailey (talk) 01:41, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Hello

Hi, I am a bit confused but it is okay so far how about for you? Alyssa Bhagwandin (talk) 01:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC) Hi

Yea me too, the wikipedia work is just more enticing. Joan Bailey (talk) 02:43, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Xyzbb1253, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

   Introduction to Wikipedia
   The five pillars of Wikipedia
   How to edit a page and How to develop articles
   How to create your first article
   Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (Xyzbb1253 (talk) 02:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 14:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC) Help-browser.svg You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the new contributors help desk, the help desk, or join the #wikipedia-en-help IRC help channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access.[reply]

The links in the Welcome message may answer your question; if not, place another {{helpme}} below this, and write your question below it. I have moved this down, because new additions to talk pages normally go at the bottom, and that is where people wil look for them. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

go, go, go

By my count you have 20 points on your userpage. You should finish it up and post your peer-review request on Bb. Dr Ashton (talk) 17:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi thanks for your review, but you need to paste it on the page where it says peer-review under my name. and for anybody else you graded you need to put your review under their name and if it doesn't exist you need to create it:) Aaleksanian 00:58, 23 February 2013 (UTC) self-assessment form

You are correct! I forgot to put it on Bb. Thanks for reminding me. It's in the Learning Wikipedia folder. Dr Ashton (talk) 15:03, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, yes you are right, I saw it now, thanks. I don't know why you didn't give me the point for the user page being signed, cause it is.

Aaleksanian 02:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaleksanian (talk • contribs)

Hi, well I actually have been signing always, but there was a problem with my settings in a preferences. So thank you for bringing it to my attention.

Aaleksanian (talk) 01:55, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

self assessment

hello i was wondering if you figured out where the self assessment form is and how to do itDJames5 (talk) 17:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC) File permission problem with File:CUNY York College Emblem.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CUNY York College Emblem.jpg, which you've sourced to http://shanaaharvin.com/?p=619. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

   make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
   Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 01:12, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Feedback on 4 edits[edit]

I have no feedback on your edits. As I said, no feedback = A+ Dr Ashton (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you might do in I/O[edit]

The article on work design needs a lot of work. There's few references, and major work is not covered, like Hackman & Oldham's job characteristics theory. I'm putting this here because the talk page for the I/O article has been very contentious. Psyc12 (talk) 01:13, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you should point out that article a friend of mine edited it about a year ago, well I'll take a look at make a few edits to page. Thank you Xyzbb1253 (talk) 03:29, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abstract Feedback[edit]

It looks great, interesting/catchy title! --KierraA. (talk) 14:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abstract Feedback[edit]

Yea, I agree with Kierra, it look great. It is will work. Thank You. (Devika Singh (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Abstract Feedback[edit]

The objective has already been mentioned in a simple format and you have used verifiable and other terms such as primary and secondary terms which readers who are not familiar with Wikipedia may still understand. If I would add a few sentences I can definitely talk a little about what I/O psychology Example) applies psychological theories and principles to organizations. Often referred to as I/O psychology, this field focuses on increasing workplace productivity and related issues. And from that we can expand our objective within Wikipedia and then go on to explaining our goals for the study. Oplmnq3 (talk) 22:38, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abstract[edit]

It looks good. I edited it and left some notes for you. Thanks for taking care of this!

Dr Ashton (talk) 14:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Science Leader![edit]

	Leadership on a Research Poster
	Thank you for taking the lead with the poster abstract! Dr Ashton (talk) 15:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

week 6[edit]

What citations does it still need? The assignment was to take care of the tag (so the tag can be removed).

Dr Ashton (talk) 22:54, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Industrial & Organizational Assessment[edit]

Hey Team hope everyone is having a productive weekend!

Let us begin with a couple of terms we should definitely cite, "Psychological Testing" and "Work Sampling" should be cited which I have done It is one of the tools for individual assessments. I have also noticed that the article is still written in a opinionated matter. The improvements can be made but therefore we should all be more careful on certain words to be used that may prevent the article to be continued to be written in this format. Including the main definition of Industrial/Organizational Assessment the two quotes are used to define a term, lets simplify the quote paraphrase it to a solid meaning and just cite the quote. What do you think? Oplmnq3 (talk) 00:33, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Minor barnstar
	A barnstar for your links to the I&O Assessment page! Dr Ashton (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Title[edit]

Now reviewing the link; Individual Assessment looks like a good title in replacement of Industrial & Organizational Assessment

--KierraA. (talk) 16:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

team effectiveness[edit]

Is this page your stub?

Dr Ashton (talk) 21:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

team effectiveness[edit]

Yes you can do this Dr Ashton (talk) 16:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

re:assignment for inclusion criteria[edit]

Okay, it looks good to me Dr Ashton (talk) 13:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Team effectiveness[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Team effectiveness you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 20:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Team effectiveness/GA1[edit]

Please see comments awaiting your response, at Talk:Team effectiveness/GA1. — Cirt (talk) 00:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Team effectiveness[edit]

The article Team effectiveness you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Team effectiveness for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]