User talk:Ycplaer

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TaoWoAini (talk) 23:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Links to videos are not references; Wikipedia is not a repository for fan material. Drmies (talk) 15:48, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warned for edit warring at Tao (entertainer)[edit]

The edit warring report has been closed. You are warned that you may be blocked if you continue to make large changes at Tao (entertainer) while failing to engage in any discussions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:52, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Tao (entertainer)[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Per this edit which you made since the warning I issued above. Yet another large change with no discussion. If you never pay attention to feedback from others, it seems unlikely you will be able to follow our quality standards for articles. EdJohnston (talk) 16:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is YCplaer/Orzijunmyeon persistant disruptive behavior possible sock puppetry and vandalism. Thank you. GAB^Hello! 23:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ycplaer. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]