User talk:Ycxu2019

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Ycxu2019, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• How to add those all-important references
• Simplified Manual of Style
• The Signpost, our newspaper.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! EdChem (talk) 02:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Some General Advice

Ycxu2019, I am assuming that you are Xu You Cheng who wrote three articles (doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.10.012, doi:10.12688/f1000research.18134.1, and doi:10.3390/sym11121445) that are referenced in the non-helical models of DNA structure article. The last of these was added by you, and so it appears that you are seeking to add citations to your own work, which needs to be done with great care and in line with the advice at WP:SELFCITE. You also should acknowledge and act on the advice at WP:COI regarding editing with a conflict of interest. I note that a conflict of interests exists even if you are not Xu You Cheng but are editing at his direction or on his behalf. I apologise if my assumption is incorrect and hope you can understand why your user name and edits lead me to this assumption.

I have began a discussion on the talk page of the article, which you are welcome to join. Wikipedia can certainly benefit from the contributions of scientists but we do need to reflect the consensus in mainstream sources and with due weight to their prominence within the literature of science. The addition of your paper from F1000Research, for example, is problematic given it has two reviewers requesting modifications and one outright rejection which, I am advised by Evolution and evolvability means that standard practice would regard it as a preprint and not yet published.

As a new editor, I encourage you to make use of the teahouse and article talk pages, and even talk pages for users (such as this one for you), to ask questions and seek advice. The talk pages of relevant WikiProjects (like the Genetics WikiProject, the Molecular and Cell Biology WikiProject, and the Chemistry WikiProject) are also great places to seek assistance and to build connections with editors with similar interests. Feel free to contact me at my user talk page, too. EdChem (talk) 02:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)