Jump to content

User talk:Yenamare

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yenamare (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

that's really nice and all to have an actually related case, to an actual account, but see mind you that this is my only other account. It was only created because my other one was blocked. I was just going around wikipedia, saw an article that I always read, looking weird. Went down to the bottom of it, and found out a bunch of accounts are editing and deleting stuff, and no one is succeeding at stopping them. I read further and I undid reviews that started editwars on articles; but yeah, I guess I should've read the content. I just thought the format looked better at first glance you know. And random86 started to look like a troll, so I tried to contact administrators about it. However, whoosh! I suddenly get a notice of being a master sockpuppet; whatever that meant. So I look it up, and it doesn't apply, so I go for the quick automated unblock ( at least I thought it was) But the administrators that got me stuck there, couldn't perceive how I was unrelated to the accused socks (thanks to you guys I learned a lot of stuff from wiki, from being blocked that is), I got defaulted on the list unjustly, then for lack of proof, I had to be the puppetmaster right?

What do you expect me to do? Just lay low, and pretend I didn't get my favorite username stolen from me? No, I just abandoned it, cancelled my email association with it, and created a new accoun where I can figure out, which people are pulling strings, because it's way to weird that the same names I saw in the edit history, were the same people attacking me on the masta wu incident, completely unrelated, so by me they had to be related. I was again browsing through articles, and found the same people I'd interacted with or that I'd seen interactions from, preparing to merge and delete articles, I just looked at the articles and I thought they were fined, so I opposed the merge. But one of the users that always comment together, replied with an 'agree' post, without any reason , except saying that it is the same as the person who proposed the deletion/merge. So of course I freaked out, there's one mastermind person, controlling a bunch of other accounts, or even a group of people congregating against any opposition they may get. And I just researched based on that theory, and submitted the investigation page after I had enough evidence that there is something weird going on, because only they get their way, even thought this is a wiki site.

This isn't a sock puppet, I didn't even know what that was until 4 days ago ( where conveniently I was added to an already existing case, and conveniently made responsible). This is a new account, I haven't made edits with the other, I can't. I never had two or more functional accounts at the same time. Tell me please how the incident with editing was sock puppetry, and how this is too, or even more, how I instigated all of this.

I hope the IP stuff isn't blocked. I don't know how that works but this is a university network, many people will be using it, I don't think each user account has an IP, it's generally each computer, or the internet or wifi itself right?

Decline reason:

"It was only created because my other one was blocked." That's not permitted, and accounts created to evade a block will themselves be blocked. If we got the original block wrong, please make an unblock request with that account. However, I'll have to note that your own edits right from the start were extremely hostile and did not contribute to a collaborative editing environment, at times bordering on outright trolling. Even if we got the sockpuppetry wrong, you'd have to modify your conduct significantly if you want to resume editing Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 18:28, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.