User talk:Yirch

Speedy deletion nomination of Viral species identification[edit]

Hello Yirch,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Viral species identification, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Virus. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 01:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Totally understand, cheers!! Yirch (talk) 21:27, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hi Yirch! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ChromaNebula (talk) 02:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Milnesium alpigenum has been accepted[edit]

Milnesium alpigenum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JBW (talk) 09:45, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Microbacterium virus MuffinTheCat moved to draftspace, the article needs to be developed and it needs citations in reliable sources to support the claims[edit]

An article you recently created, Microbacterium virus MuffinTheCat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Netherzone (talk) 01:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep I know, just had to quickly save my progress on the draft, didn't have time to put my cites on. Thanks however! Yirch (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! I did not want it to get speedy-deleted. At first I thought it was a joke, but after doing some research I saw that it was a real thing, therefore I draftified. Good luck with the article and pats to Muffin (sounds like there is a good back story here...) Netherzone (talk) 02:54, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha, indeed a very interesting project. Think I went a little to deep for an extremely low importance species, but I had to do it for Muffin! Yirch (talk) 11:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article looks really good! I happen to like coming across articles on obscure topics that are well crafted - as long as there is notability. I hope you don't mind that I fixed three (orange) links that pointed to disambiguate pages, the fourth one I wasn't sure about: genetic conservation -- should that point to: conserved sequences or conservation genetics? Netherzone (talk) 15:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yep sorry, It was a quick link job, conserved sequences is the correct link, cheers! Yirch (talk) 20:17, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for all your help! Muffin would be proud. Yirch (talk) 20:53, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you![edit]

This cat thinks all cats are very proud of Muffin's contribution to biology!

Netherzone (talk) 21:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fletchervirus has been accepted[edit]

Fletchervirus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 01:22, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Yirch (talk) 23:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding short descriptions to redirects[edit]

I noticed that you have added short descriptions to several redirects. Please refrain from doing this, as it causes them to break and no longer function as a redirect. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 03:55, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How can these articles be distinguished easily, from articles that are safe to edit? Yirch (talk) 04:35, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was using the mobile app to edit, it must have edited the incorrect page when i used the respective pages' shortcuts, I have reverted any remaining mistakes, will be more careful, cheers Padgriffin! Yirch (talk) 05:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: -2 (August 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:-2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:44, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yirch! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:44, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of immune cells[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of immune cells, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of immune cells[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of immune cells, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Square root of pi (September 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Don't get me wrong, I'd love to approve the square root of pi as an article, but currently the sourcing is just not there. Half of the references exist to support the fact that "pi was discussed in pop culture X", and with a mathematical constant of this scale and magnitude, focusing on the technical aspects of this number within mathematics would be preferential.

This article was deleted 18 years ago during an AfD; I think there's been plenty of time since then to give this another go in article-space, given that since then Pi has become a featured article and is the 3rd most viewed number article on Wikipedia only behind 0 and 1, receiving more pageviews than every other integer. Because of this, as well as Pi's Featured Article status, I don't think merging with Pi is the right call, as it would be overriding the precedent and existing content there. If there's any place to talk about the square root of pi, I feel it would be on its own standalone article.

Still though, all things being equal, the sources that are provided seem to be routine coverage from math databases, and aren't currently enough to demonstrate the notability of this topic.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Square root of pi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback! May choose to help improve this article in future. Yirch (talk) 05:12, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:-2[edit]

Hello, Yirch. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:-2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of subviral agents[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of subviral agents, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]