User talk:Ytuniverse

This is Ytuniverse's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quim Garrigolas (October 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quim Garrigolas (October 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO) but presently does not. As other reviewers have noted, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable . Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see referencing for beginners. Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements then resubmit the page and ping me and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quim Garrigolas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 23:31, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabrils: Hi, I have applied the comments you made to me 2 months ago, adding multiple new sources I found and new relevant information.

Thank you very much. Happy holidays and happy new year in advance! Ytuniverse (talk) 16:36, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quim Garrigolas (December 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quim Garrigolas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 16:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pichemist:: Hi, can you expain me in a comment why the article does not qualify?

Like @Cabrils: did 2 months ago.

Thank you and happy holidays! Ytuniverse (talk) 01:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the problem is that the article does not yet meet the requirements of WP:ANYBIO-- please read that link thoroughly. Currently, the draft does not show that Garrigolas is "notable". The sources need to be reliable: please see what a "reliable source" is at WP:RS. Hope this helps! Cabrils (talk) 01:37, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! Ytuniverse (talk) 01:38, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think maybe it's the wrong type of wikipedia page, because I see that Creative professionals is more suitable than Biography Ytuniverse (talk) 01:40, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it is not "the wrong type of Wikipedia page": there are no "types of Wikipedia pages". All Wikipedia pages need to meet the notability requirements of WP:GNG; and then some specific subjects can meet the notability requirements of specific subjects: I think you are suggesting that Garrigolas might meet WP:CREATIVE? Possibly he might, but again, the draft requires multiple reliable sources, which currently it does not have. What will make the draft acceptable is the addition of multiple reliable sources that evidence the subject (Garrigolas) meets the requirements of at least WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO and/or other specific subjects like WP:CREATIVE, WP:PROF etc. Cabrils (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I understand it know.

Thank you for your comment! Ytuniverse (talk) 01:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any page about a person is, by definition, a "biography". Cabrils (talk) 01:47, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page is about a 22 year old businessman-- honestly, he is very young and seems to have not yet achieved the notability required to justify a Wikipedia page-- I think it is WP:TOOSOON. Again, the draft tends to read too much like a CV which would appear on LinkedIn etc, which Wikipedia is not. Hope this helps! Cabrils (talk) 01:51, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great comment. Thank you for your help! Ytuniverse (talk) 01:52, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Quim Garrigolas (April 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Pure promo piece. None of the sources cited provide anything more than passing mentions; most don't even mention Garrigolas once.

Also, per WP:BLP, far too much of the content is unsupported.

Unless the referencing is significantly improved, this is fast heading for a rejection.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Quim Garrigolas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Ytuniverse. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Quim Garrigolas, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Quim Garrigolas[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Quim Garrigolas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:46, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]