User talk:Zack McKracken

As very busy reporter i don't have much time. And because my traveling around the world. I don't will be often here in wikipedia (I don't use phones because of the 60MHz humming weapon of some bad aliens) ;-)

But as honst reporter i will replay on all of your questions.

:-)

Zack McKracken (talk) 14:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

F/A-18C Mock-up MAGO[edit]

Hi, I am dropping this note to you because you created the article at F/A-18C Mock-up MAGO. There is a discussion at Talk:F/A-18C Mock-up MAGO#MAGO which you might want to take a look at. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 17:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of F/A-18C Mock-up MAGO for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article F/A-18C Mock-up MAGO is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F/A-18C Mock-up MAGO until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 21:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

I have requested a sockpuppet investigation, as I doubt if you are a genuine editor. See: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FFA P-16. The Banner talk 20:34, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 12:22, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]