User talk:Zaid Haji Kassam

Welcome![edit]

Welcome	to	Wikipedia!
Zaid Haji Kassam!

I've noticed some of your contributions and I want to say hello!
Have a look at the links below if you want to learn more about editing Wikipedia:
Introduction	Navigating Wikipedia	Editing Wikipedia articles
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia	Writing your very first article	HELP ME!
Here are some of the basic Wikipedia policies that you should be aware of:
Be BOLD!	Assume good faith	Be civil and polite
Don't infringe copyright	Vandals aren't nice	Don't get blocked
If you need any more help, visit the Teahouse for friendly help from other editors, or go on the Wikipedia Adventure for a fun and interactive way of learning about Wikipedia.
And if you still have unanswered questions, click this link to ask a question, and someone will come to help you soon.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Girish Vanvari (July 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MaxnaCarta were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Possibly notable but I’m unconvinced. Seems rather routine announcements. Overall this comes across as a LinkedIn profile rather than an encyclopaedia article. If the author has a conflict of interest they should reconsider submitting again and wait for an independent editor to write an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Girish Vanvari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 09:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zaid Haji Kassam! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — MaxnaCarta ( 💬 • 📝 ) 09:16, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Girish Vanvari (November 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough significant coverage in independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Girish Vanvari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:34, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Girish Vanvari[edit]

Hello, Zaid Haji Kassam. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Girish Vanvari, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Girish Vanvari[edit]

Hello, Zaid Haji Kassam. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Girish Vanvari".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]