User talk:Zakoni

You just beached wp:3rr, I'm afraid I have to report this kind of edit-warring in case you don't self-revert and participate in the correspondent talkpage.Alexikoua (talk) 12:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Skopje. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:09, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for tendentious disruptive editing and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:27, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ihave edited correct information.You can read my sources.Source for Albania: http://www.instat.gov.al/media/178070/rezultatet_kryesore_t__censusit_t__popullsis__dhe_banesave_2011_n__shqip_ri.pdf .I think that deleting my information about Albania is a VANDALISM and NATIONALISM because MY INFORMATION IS BASED IN THE OFFICIAL POPULATION CENSUS MADE BY THE ALBANIAN GOVERNMENT IN 2011 . ALSO ,MY SOURCSE FOR ALBANIANS PAGE : http://www.turkishclass.com/forumTitle_51361. I THINK THAT YOU MUST CONSIDER MY SOURCSE ABOUT ALBANIANS.ALSO,i have edited SKOPJE by ADDING THE ALBANIAN NAME FOR SKOPJE AS AN IMPORTANT PERCENTAGE OF SKOPJE POPULATION IS ALBANIAN!!!!!!!!.I THINK AS ADMINISTRATORS OF WIKIPEIDIA YOU MUST BE MORE RESPONSIBLE AND CAREFULL ABOUT YOUR DECISIONS.ALSO, I WANTED FROM YOU TO TAKE IN ACCOUNT THAT USER:ALEKSIKOUA HAS MANIPULATED THE INFORMATIONS BY INCREASING THE GREEK POPULATION IN ALBANIA(BASED IN THE OFFICIAL SOURCES OF ALBANIAN GOVERNMENT....IF ALEKSIKOUA DOES NOT TAKE IN ACCOUNT THE OFFICIAL INFORMATIONS OF THE ALBANIAN GOVERNMENT (YEAR 2011) I THINK THAT THAT USER IS JUST ANOTHER CHAUVINIST .YOURS FAITHFULLY:USER:ZAKONI Zakoni (talk) 13:40, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request is exactly the sort of thing you are blocked for in the first place. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think that i understood what I am blocked for, I will not do it again.I promise I will not offend anymore that dog.Please forgive me!!!!!!! Zakoni (talk) 20:16, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It seems unlikely that you have any grasp on why you are blocked; your request includes yet another personal attack. Please note that further poor requests will likely result in the removal of your ability to edit this page as well. Kuru (talk) 00:35, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I am very disappointed because I thought that Wikipedia is a serious project.I have edited some information but then I was blocked for 2 days because my information.In fact my information was besed on the official data of Albanian government about ethnic population in Albania.http://www.instat.gov.al/media/178070/rezultatet_kryesore_t__censusit_t__popullsis__dhe_banesave_2011_n__shqip_ri.pdf I think that the information in Wikipedia/Albania is incorrect.In addition the sources used by the editors of this page :https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/al.html says the same thing with me (greek percentage 0.87 percent).In addition the other sources used by the editors are earlier of the year 2010 and they are not official as MY source do.In fact my information is not taken in account.I think that I am not a vandal because I am not editing false information as some other people are doing(the editor Aleksikoua has edited information that is not in accordance with his source-CIA.).And then I am the only one who is penalized because I edited THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION OF THE ALBANIAN GOVERNMENT OF THE YEAR 2013!!!!!!!! Yours faithfully, user:Zakoni. p.s:Please, if you think that editing based on the official government census and CIA FACTBOOK is vandalism please tell me so I will delete my Wikipedia account as wikipedia is TOO SERIOUS for me!!!!!!!!! Zakoni (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Once again, you've failed to acknowledge the reasons for your block. Your block isn't about content; it is about your behavior. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:48, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2014[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for renewed revert-warring immediately after your last block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:17, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is strange!!!!!!!I edited some information based on facts!!!!What is wrong with that???????? Zakoni (talk) 16:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's even stranger that you seem to have no concept what edit-warring is, since you resumed doing it immediately after a block for it. You now have a week to read WP:EW. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:31, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think that the block is no longer necessary because every error is deleted from that page.If possible,unblock me as soon as possible.I do not have any problems with the page about Albania anymore. Zakoni (talk) 18:29, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You continue not to understand the reason for your block. You are not blocked for your editing, as such; you are blocked for edit warring. Do you know what edit warring is? Please give, in your next unblock request, your understanding of edit warring. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:21, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It is said clearly:An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions, rather than trying to resolve the disagreement through discussion.You must try to solve the disagreements through discussion on the talk page.So if possible,unblock me as soon as possible! Zakoni (talk) 08:47, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

expired Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If possible,unblock me as I will not make war edits anymore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Zakoni (talk) 09:30, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

expired Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First, one request at a time. I'm not sure if I should IAR, so I'll let the admins do it. Also, what will you do if unblocked? Origamite^{is out right now} 02:44, 6 July 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Origamian (talk • contribs) [reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block has been set to expire: 16:17, 9 July 2014.The blocking has expired?Why I can not edit currently?Zakoni (talk) 15:28, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

expired Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:32, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that you posted this unblock request at 15:28 and the block expires at 16:17 (both in UTC times), not being able to edit stands to reason. Your block has now expired, you can remove the open unblock requests from your talk page or wait for an admin to close them off. Blackmane (talk) 16:37, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Greeks. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Alexikoua (talk) 17:02, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page messages[edit]

Hi Zakoni, I just removed a few messages you left on other user's talk pages. These messages were never left there and are from your user page and in one case an IP's user page, and all left by other users, not you. Please do not add messages that appear to be from other users. Sam Walton (talk) 20:36, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:48, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I think that I have edited only resoursed articles.I have have edited with reliable sources.I want from you to see my last editings because I think that Wikipedia is acting as a racist structure for the only reason that populations of ethnic groups (croatians,serbs,bulgarians etc) in Balkan are exaggerated and unreliable.So please,do not block me,but have a look to the balkan ethnic groups that are exaggerated.Actually,i created my Wikipedia account to help and to solve problems, not te see some amplificated population data about ethnic gropous in wikipedia.If you think that i am not correct,see the total populations of ethnic groups of serbs,croatins,bulgarians, etc that are in the contrast with the sources numbers(you can see albanians too that are only 2 millions in the total,when there are much higher according to the sources used by editors).As for my account,you can delete it,as i think that wikipedia is full of exaggerated number.Thank you for your patience!Yours faithfully,Zakoni. Zakoni (talk) 7:26 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Once again, your unblock appeal fails utterly to address the behaviour for which you were blocked. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:35, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zakoni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok chinese boy,unblock me as i will do not make any disruptive editing! Zakoni (talk) 12:24, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below; Yunshui beat me to the same action by seconds. Kuru (talk) 12:42, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Clearly this account is producing more heat than light - for a prevelant pattern of unrepentant edit warring, personal attacks and inappropriate unblock requests, I'm extending your block to indefinite and removing your talkpage access. Yunshui ^雲 _水 12:40, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]