User talk:Zamatt

This is Zamatt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Metaverse ethics (May 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Metaverse ethics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Metaverse ethics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 19:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zamatt! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil 665 19:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nearlyevil, thank you so much for your feedback, I really appreciate it.

However I'm not very clear with the criteria for proposing the deletion and not approval of this article. For example, if you look at this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot_ethics you see that the language of the text is similar and the tone is more like an informative article as an encyclopaedia rather than an essay. This is what I've been trying hard to work on and it is obscure to me why such a similar article would not be removed or flagged by the wikipedia community?

Also, the facts behind this new wikipedia article are published in technical reports reviewed by the scientific committee from the University of Cambridge, therefore by reading all the documentation information about not publishing original content, It is obscure to me, why this rejection happened so fast, considering that the concepts explained in this article are already published in scientifically validated and reviewed literature.

Thank you so much for your work.

Hope to hear from you soon.

Best,

Zamatt Zamatt (talk) 09:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Metaverse ethics[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Metaverse ethics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.metavethics.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jalen Folf (talk) 04:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jalen Folf, thank you so much for your feedback, I really appreciate it and it is so valuable.

However I'm not very clear with the criteria for proposing the deletion and not approval of this article. For example, if you look at this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot_ethics you see that the language of the text is similar and the tone is more like an informative article as an encyclopaedia rather than an essay. This is what I've been trying hard to work on and it is obscure to me why such a similar article would not be removed or flagged by the wikipedia community?

Also, the facts behind this new wikipedia article are published in technical reports reviewed by the scientific committee from the University of Cambridge, and the content of the website https://www.metavethics.com/ has no copyright infringement as it is all created and held by the authors of the article on Wikipedia, therefore we own the copyright. We also declared the connection between the article creators and the content in the article. It is obscure to me, why this rejection happened so fast, considering that the concepts explained in this article are already published in scientifically validated and reviewed literature.

Thank you so much for your work, I really appreciate it.

Hope to hear from you soon.

Best,

Zamatt Zamatt (talk) 10:00, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Metaverse ethics[edit]

Hello, Zamatt. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Metaverse ethics, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Metaverse ethics[edit]

Hello, Zamatt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Metaverse ethics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Metaverse ethics (June 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Metaverse. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article relies heavily on work of a single author for most of its content, and I'm not convinced that there's enough on this subject at this stage outside of that to justify its own article. I suspect at this point that an "Ethics" section within the primary Metaverse article is probably sufficient at this point, and that a separate article could be revisited once there's a wider body of literature.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Metaverse ethics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 19:35, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Metaverse ethics[edit]

Hello, Zamatt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Metaverse ethics".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]