User talk:ZappyLongNose

Fredr[edit]

You attempt some accounts to block. This is a blocking process that iz strict. --Anonymous user to Administrators. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.54.144 (talk) 10:10, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Farewell text[edit]

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

I will leave Wikipedia from now. But I still find articles here.

Stop[edit]

Zappy, don't make accounts again. Like you did the account AbbaCat, I will request you a speedy deletion to make Wikipedia calm from now. I will appeal a deletion on Wednesday. AllenHaggaiMan (talk) 10:44, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Socking[edit]

This user created User:AbbaCat, now blocked. He may appear here logged in to this account and request an unblock. This post is for the record. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:24, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock detail[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZappyLongNose (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I miss my account!!! I gonna improve myself. ZappyLongNose (talk) 00:59, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request does not address the reason you are blocked or how you plan to improve. Additionally, CheckUser confirms that you have socked as recently as today (User:AbbaCat). Unblock declined. Tiptoety ^talk 01:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zappy, if you really, really want, I can maybe help. First, never make another account. Second, tell me here what kind of edits you will make. If you want suggestions, I can give some. You are a kid and probably smart. You'd be a good editor, but your English maybe not good enough to do actual writing. However, you can find references (like detective work), find images, do other things. I can help. Please respond here and maybe we can work things out, okay? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 01:55, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers[edit]

Hi ZappyLongNose,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]