User talk:ZawahirKashif

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tops And Bottoms (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HickoryOughtShirt?4 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tops And Bottoms and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tops And Bottoms, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, ZawahirKashif! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 03:17, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tops And Bottoms (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tops And Bottoms and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tops And Bottoms, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tops And Bottoms has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tops And Bottoms. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello ZawahirKashif. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:ZawahirKashif. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=ZawahirKashif|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 22:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello 331dot.

I'm a voluntarily writing about this as I'm a newbie in this field, and I'm eager to learn more about writing Wikipedia's content . However, I would love to get some compensation from you (if you compensate volunteer writers). Thanks.

Regards,

Zawahir Kashif. ZawahirKashif (talk) 23:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not pay those who edit here. You identified yourself as "creative content writer who want to start contributing articles related to retail & fashion brands on your platform". If you are associated with or represent the brands you contribute about, it is a conflict of interest. If they pay you(or will) you must disclose that per the Terms of Use. 331dot (talk) 00:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes I identified myself as a "creative content writer who want to start contributing articles related to retail & fashion brands on your platform" and I really want to do it and I am learning a lot right now about this platform. I am also eager to contribute in more drafts and No I am not getting paid. ZawahirKashif (talk) 00:46, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

You also stated " i reached the person in the store and asked for the owner permission to let me write about their business. Luckily, I was granted permission from the owner." This means you have a conflict of interest that you should formally disclose. Articles are typically written without any involvement from, or even the knowledge of, the subject. You furthermore stated "I've personally interviewed the brand owners, as well as visited their sites (location of their retail store)." That's a lot of work (some of it expensive work) to do just for someone editing in their free time(as most of us do). Quite frankly I find it very difficult to believe you aren't getting or going to get compensation here. You didn't pick Tops and Bottoms at random to write about. 331dot (talk) 01:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

It's okay the article got deleted I will write more carefully next time ZawahirKashif (talk) 15:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Tops And Bottoms

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Tops And Bottoms, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Arado Ar 196 (talk/contributions) 23:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

With all due respect, I completely value your concerns regarding the platforms and policies I am new to this platform and trying to write a history of a store I didn't mean to violate any policy I am writing this as my first article and will be writing more articles in future on different topics I put days and all of my research into it this article is not for any promotional stuff even I can write it on the top of my article I hope you consider my request and let me publish this article of Wikipedia

I hope you understand and reconsider your decision ZawahirKashif (talk) 00:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)