User talk:Zawed/Archive 4
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your GA nomination of Harry Fulton
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harry Fulton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jim Sweeney -- Jim Sweeney (talk) 19:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Awarded to Zawed, as part of AustralianRupert's 2014 New Year Honours List, in recognition of his work as an article writer working on New Zealand-related articles throughout 2013. Thank you and keep up the good work! AustralianRupert (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |
- Many thanks AR! Although it is not the reason why I edit here, it is nice to be recognised for one's work. Zawed (talk) 23:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Harry Fulton
The article Harry Fulton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Harry Fulton for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jim Sweeney -- Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:11, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Harry Fulton
The article Harry Fulton you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Harry Fulton for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jim Sweeney -- Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
A beer for you!
|
Harry Fulton has been assessed as a Good Article. Well done Cheers! Jim Sweeney (talk) 08:26, 6 January 2014 (UTC) |
Congratulations!
|
The WikiProject Barnstar | |
| I am delighted to present you with this WikiProject Barnstar in recognition of your extensive contributions to the Military history WikiProject, as evidenced by your being nominated for the 2013 "Military historian of the Year" award. We're grateful for your help and look forward to seeing more of your excellent work in the coming year. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:13, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
1st Passchendaele
Greetings Zawed, it was nice to see that 3rd Ypres has a new book. Did MacDonald put all the blame on Godley or put his failings into a context of the British machine beginning to break down in other respects too? RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 15:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
- Gidday Keith-264, I hope you found the review interesting. Sorry for delay in getting back to you, I have just moved house (downsized actually, to an apartment). Godley cops the lion's share of blame; fundamentally, MacDonald is critical of Godley's leadership style, his focus on his career, the way in which he ran his headquarters and his blind adherence to a timetable regardless of deteriorating conditions. His analysis is more directed at the tactical level (corps/divisional arrangements) rather than at a strategic (army) level. Does that answer your question? Zawed (talk) 08:07, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
- It does thanks. I was most influenced when writing on the page by stories like the air reconnaissance report which erroneously put the front line after Poelcapelle where it was supposed to be, rather than 500 yards west - the sort of practical detail that general remarks about the collapse of links with the rear amount to. It seemed to me that the return of the rains made the successes of 20, 26 Sep and 4 Oct backfire, similar to the dilemmas that the Germans encountered at Verdun the year before - go on or go back, exploit the effect of 4 Oct/9 Oct by having another go quickly. I'll have a go at an inter-library loan considering the price. You might be interested in Krause Early Trench Tactics in the French Army 2013 which makes a good case for the failings of the French and British in 1915 being implementation rather than ignorance of what worked. Hope you're settling in. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 08:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of William Garnett Braithwaite
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Garnett Braithwaite you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HueSatLum -- HueSatLum (talk) 19:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your GA nomination of William Garnett Braithwaite
The article William Garnett Braithwaite you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Garnett Braithwaite for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HueSatLum -- HueSatLum (talk) 22:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of William Edward Sanders
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article William Edward Sanders you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 10:10, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of William Edward Sanders
The article William Edward Sanders you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:William Edward Sanders for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Seabuckthorn -- Seabuckthorn (talk) 15:16, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thomas Brunner may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- born April 1821, in [[Oxford]], [[England]]; died 22 April 1874 in [[Nelson, New Zealand]]) was an [English-born [[Surveying|surveyor]] and [[explorer]] remembered for his exploration of the [[West
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- BRM P126 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pedro Rodriguez
- BRM P133 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pedro Rodriguez
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Thomas Brunner
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Thomas Brunner you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 20:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Thomas Brunner
The article Thomas Brunner you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Thomas Brunner for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Rosiestep -- Rosiestep (talk) 13:21, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Jan to Mar 14 Military History reviews
|
The Content Review Medal of Merit | |
| By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted contributions to the WikiProject's Peer, Good Article, A-Class and Featured Article reviews for the period January–March 2014, I am delighted to award you the Content Review Medal of Merit. During this period you undertook 8 reviews. Without reviewers it would be very difficult for our writers to achieve their goals of creating high quality content, so your efforts are greatly appreciated. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC) |
The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis Morphet Twisleton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Māori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
May contest
G'day cobber, you might like to re-insert that other article you had out up. It appears we are running with C-Class and below being self-assessed for the contest. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 08:39, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (Walter McKinnon) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Walter McKinnon, Zawed!
Wikipedia editor GELongstreet just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
WW2 section could need more details.
To reply, leave a comment on GELongstreet's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Disambiguation link notification for June 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jack Lyon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Captain (rank) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in an interview
Hi Zawed, I'd like to invite you to participate in a group interview in the upcoming August issue of the Military History Wikiproject's newsletter, The Bugle, with editors who work on articles concerning World War I. We're conducting this interview to mark the centenary of the war, and it forms part of a semi-regular series of interviews on thematic topics. If you're able to participate, I'd be grateful if you could post responses to the questions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/August 2014/Interview by next Sunday 17 July. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 10:24, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant 10 August, not 17 July. I shouldn't be typing anything with a heavy cold! Nick-D (talk) 01:18, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
Le Quesnoy
Thank you, I liked it (and added a couple of flourishes) RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 12:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback Keith-264, glad you liked it. It was a bit of a challenge as I've only done a couple of battle type articles but this one is easily the most detailed. Thanks for the tweaks you made as well, I totally forgot to do the distance conversions. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 07:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Bugden, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Australian Imperial Force and Victory Medal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Buttes New British Cemetery
Just saw your new page and thought I'd add my congratulations. Added a couple of flourishes too.Keith-264 (talk) 09:55, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Keith - I'd noticed you had already made some tweaks! Cheers. Zawed (talk) 10:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:25, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918)
The article Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Capture of Le Quesnoy (1918) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 20:22, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Charles Heaphy
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charles Heaphy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 19:40, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Charles Heaphy
The article Charles Heaphy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Charles Heaphy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 20:25, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of HMS Philomel (1890)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Philomel (1890) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 19:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of HMS Philomel (1890)
The article HMS Philomel (1890) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Philomel (1890) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 19:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux
|
NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
September-October 2014 backlog reduction drive
|
September-October 2014 backlog reduction drive | |
| By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for placing third in the WikiProject's September–October 2014 backlog reduction drive, I hereby award you this Bronze Wiki. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 05:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC) |
|
WikiChevrons | |
| By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your contributions to the WikiProject's September–October 2014 backlog reduction drive, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject award. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 05:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC) |
Peer review request for Dave Gallaher
Hey Zawed. I notice you have a prodigious record on New Zealand-focused MilHist articles, so was wondering if you could spend the time to contribute to my peer review of Dave Gallaher here. Any feedback at all would be appreciated. Thanks. -- Shudde talk 06:52, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
- Gidday Shudde, I will have a good look at the article shortly but in the meantime I have had a quick look at the military sections and a few things stand out. Ranks shouldn't be capitalised unless being used as a title; i.e "Sergeant Gallaher" is OK but "Gallaher was promoted to Sergeant" is not. In the WWI section, you have two different enlistment dates. The medals are service medals (like his Boer War medals), the way it is written suggests they are gallantry awards. As I say, I will have a closer look over the whole article later and will leave comments on the peer review page. Zawed (talk) 07:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 18th Battalion (New Zealand)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 18th Battalion (New Zealand) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 10:42, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 18th Battalion (New Zealand)
The article 18th Battalion (New Zealand) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:18th Battalion (New Zealand) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014
|
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cyril Bassett
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cyril Bassett you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 23:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cyril Bassett
The article Cyril Bassett you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Cyril Bassett for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Cyril Bassett
The article Cyril Bassett you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cyril Bassett for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Peacemaker67 -- Peacemaker67 (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |