User talk:Zaydx

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Zaydx, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! NiciVampireHeart 03:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zaydx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for abusing multiple accounts. I don't have multiple accounts, this is my only account. I live with six other students,@Masterpk404 happens to be one of them and he has made edits on the same article as I did. I promise this will not happen again in the future and I will not make edits on any article he makes edits on. Please unblock me.Zaydx (talk) 10:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've edited the same articles from the same IP address on the same device. Your explanation does not address this. Additionally, your edits were totally inappropriate. Your unblock request doesn't address that, either. No, better we leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zaydx (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just said that I live with 6 six students and @masterpk404 is one of them. We live in the same hostel sharing the same computer provided to us by our college. So yes, the only rule that I broke is that I have made edits on the same article as him in the past. I did not make any "inappropriate edits". That's a straight up lie. All my edits are legitimate. The person who said I made "inappropriate edits" was @RicherMan66 who is a long term abuser and whose first edit included him claiming to be a WP:SPA. The only "wrong edit" I made is that I used Daily Mail as a source on an article because I didn't know that Daily Mail is regarded as an unreliable source on wikipedia. I've addressed everything in this explanation as pointed out by the mod in the previous request.Zaydx (talk) 13:29, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Edits such as this amount to promotional rumormongering. See also WP:COWORKER; the link title isn't quite applicable, but the linked policy very much is. Huon (talk) 01:25, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked[edit]

I have revoked your talk page access. You don't get to call me a liar while simultaneously claiming you have indeed broken rules and have indeed made an inappropriate edit. And that's not even going into the multiple warnings you've removed from this page. Which... coincidentally (I don't think), were also removed by Masterpk404. Anyway, another admin will be along shortly to review your unblock request. If they choose to decline it, they are nevertheless free to reinstate your talk page access. If they do not, that leaves you with WP:UTRS. I strongly suggest not violating WP:NPA if you make use of UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 14:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]