User talk:Zootroy3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Zootroy3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:19, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zoo Montana[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to the article. I have checked out the source and cited as required by Wikipedia (see WP:CITE). In doing so, I realized that the two new sections that you added are just copied and pasted from the two Websites. This is a copyright violation (see WP:COPYVIO), and is not allowed on WikiPedia (contrary to popular belief, there are rules to editing here). I have reworded to avoid the copyright violation. In the future, please cite any information you add, and write it in your own words. Thank you. Don Lammers (talk) 00:48, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for trying to contribute a logo to Wikimedia commons for use in this article. However, there are at least two things wrong with how this was done:

  1. First, the uploaded file is huge (almost 1MB), and thus loads very slowly. Since it is a simple graphic that will be displayed in about 75x100 pixels, this is overhead that the article does not need. I have replaced this in the article with a version that I got from the Web site using Windows Snip.
  2. Second, the copyright attribution is inadequate. You cannot just declare that you own a work that is clearly already on a Web site of a company or organization. This is copyright violation pure and simple (even if you did, in fact, create the logo, the company generally owns it, and you can't prove that you created the logo). There are ways around this on Commons, which I have never used, but which allow release of material from an organization to commons, but a simple declaration is not adequate. Even fair use images are not allowed on Wikimedia Commons, though they are on Wikipedia. I uploaded my file to Wikipedia, and have properly attributed the version that I posted as "fair use", to be used ONLY on the article page.

Please carefully read the information above about conflict of interest. If your claim about being the creator of the logo is true, you are obviously in such a position, and you really should be careful about what you post. If you want changes made, you should probably post them as requests on the talk page with pointers to where other editors might find the information that you are proposing be added. Thank you. Don Lammers (talk) 16:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to think hard about releasing your logo to commons. Remember that anyone can do anything with it once you release it there. Generally the purpose of a logo is exactly the opposite -- you want it top be a unique identifier to your organization. The way I have put it in the article, your copyright is still protected and the logo is legitimately used for its main purpose of identifying the organization. Don Lammers (talk) 18:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]