Wikipedia:Bot Approvals Group/nominations/Josh Parris
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for Bot Approvals Group membership. Please do not modify it.
BAG Nomination: Josh Parris[edit]
- Josh Parris (talk · contribs)
Josh Parris has been an editor since 2005. In that time he has grown to participate extensively in the bot approvals process. He also runs the useful WildBot (talk · contribs) and helps others in the creation of bots. I am confident that Josh understands the collaborative BAG process and will be able to review the various discussions for community consensus. For these reasons I am putting him forward for BAG membership today. MBisanz talk 18:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate acceptance:
- Josh Parris 03:01, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion[edit]
Votes[edit]
- Support MBisanz talk 18:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, good editor and bot operator, no problems. — The Earwig @ 03:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support uh-huh. Tim1357 (talk) 03:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good editor, seems that wildbot is being run well. No complaints. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 03:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as I've never seen any issues with him. Also, doesn't own a furniture store. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Why not? -FASTILYsock(TALK) 06:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support –Juliancolton | Talk 14:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Josh is a trusted longtime editor, and I think he'd be a big help as a BAG member. He seems familiar with BRFA and several users above me have already expressed trust in his judgement there. On a side note, kudos to Josh for the helpful WildBot, which looks to become even more helpful when its current BRFA passes. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 01:57, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Closed as successful by Pakaran at 21:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC).[reply]
The above BAG membership discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.