Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ArshavaBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Denied.

ArshavaBot

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Аришин Дмитрий (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 13:17, Thursday January 17, 2013 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Supervised

Phyton(s):

Source code available:

Function overview: Interwiki

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s):

Estimated number of pages affected:

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No

Function details: Write on phyton.

Discussion

• This report does not inspire any confidence. BRFA can be somewhat difficult sometimes but what I'm looking at is a user who has a blocked bot, repeatedly misspells Python and an incomplete reported stating it does is interwiki. I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt so I am going to ask you questions.

1. What namespaces will your bot be editing?
2. What framework are you using?
3. How many pages will it edit a day?
4. Is it exclusion compliant?
5. What are the specifics of the interwiki task that your, blocked, bot will be doing?

—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 22:29, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Denied. WikiData is soon to be deployed on en:, so there is no more need for additional interwiki bots. GA/FA links are handled fine by existing ones. Few edits in projects and the lack of any detail in the form suggests WP:BOTNOTNOW. Please spend some time editing, familiarize with Wikipedia and then apply for a bot task properly. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 23:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.