Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Cyberbot I 2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Speedily Approved.

User:Cyberbot I 2

Operator: Cyberpower678 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 22:21, Friday August 17, 2012 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): PHP

Source code available: on Request

Function overview: adminstats, cratstats, RfX reporter, tally

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): User talk:TParis

Edit period(s): continuous

Estimated number of pages affected: number of admins using adminstats plus 3

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): yes

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): yes

Function details: these functions are already known to the community. TParis has requested that I take over these tasks because I do more maintenance and fixing on these tasks than he has time to.

Discussion

Will it continue to report to TParis's user subpage or will you create a new one for it? If this is the case all links and transclusions would have to be updated. Rcsprinter (warn) @ 09:32, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Adminstats and cratstats will run under the same. Tally and the reporter will run under mine and yes I am aware of the changes that need to be made. The tally task and the reporter are already running.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 11:50, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is this essentially the same code, or have you written your own code for this? If the former, I don't see why we can't speedily approve it. I note on the discussion on TParis's page you have made a few tweaks to how it originally ran, but I don't think they're terribly critical to the bot's function. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 17:34, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TParis and I utilize the same code. Any modifications and patches he made were implemented into my code and vice versa. I did a lot of the patch work on his bot to make sure it ran as it should.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 20:55, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily Approved. — Earwig ^talk 19:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.