Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Ganeshbot 8

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Approved.

Ganeshbot 8

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Ganeshk (talk · contribs)

Time filed: 16:26, Sunday January 9, 2011 (UTC)

Automatic or Manually assisted: Automatic supervised

Programming language(s): AWB Find and Replace

Source code available: Y

Function overview: A simple find and replace operation to update taxonomy under the clades, Heterobranchia and Nudipleura.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Gastropods#Taxonomy_of_Heterobranchia

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 753

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function details:

Gastropods project is requesting a bot to update articles under the clades, Heterobranchia and Nudipleura. Here is the plan of action,

1. Load AWB with a list of articles under Category:Nudipleura using recursive category search function (753 pages)
2. Use Find and Replace to look for

• "informal group Opisthobranchia" and replace with "clade Euthyneura"
• "opisthobranch gastropod mollusk" and replace with "gastropod mollusk"

Here is an example of the change. — Ganeshk (talk) 16:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Discussion

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Trial complete. I had to adjust my settings to handle two variations, "mollusk / mollusc" and "opistobranch / opisthobranch" for future runs. The bot request link was also incorrect on the edit summary. I will include these in the full run. — Ganeshk (talk) 23:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Seems to be OK. In Arminoidea was not changed the intro, maybe because the intro is in plural. --Snek01 (talk) 00:12, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

That was because "mollusc" was not in search criteria. I will include it in the full run. — Ganeshk (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Approved for extended trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 10:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Trial complete. I handled the two variations in this run. No issues. I ran into one other variation, "informal&nb sp;group&nb sp;[[Opisthobranchia]]". I made 10 additional edits to test this variation (the last 10). Thanks. — Ganeshk (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Looks good.  Approved.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.