Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/HujiBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.

HujiBot

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Huji

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Fully automatic, yet run under the observation of the owner.

Programming Language(s): Python, using PyWikipedia

Function Summary: Adding interwiki links.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Almost continuous. (It is never run when the owner is not near).

Edit rate requested: 4 edits per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Not on English Wikipedia.

Function Details: It is an interwiki bot on Simple English Wikipedia. It is going to be used to add links to Simple English Wikipedia articles in their English Wikipedia counterparts.

Discussion

Sounds fine to me - Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Let us know when your done. Reedy Boy 14:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Is there any update on the trial? — E ^talk_bots 05:59, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

I was away for a journey for some days. I'm running the bot right now. I think I will reach the 50 edits requirement in a day or two. Is it fine? huji—TALK 12:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I think they were just looking at moving it forward - ie approving it if everything was ok. Reedy Boy 12:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

As you might have noticed in the bot's contribs, it does interwiki related changes other than adding link to Simple En WP too. This is normal for all PyWikipedia based interwiki bots, and is also useful to the project. I thought I should mention it myself, rather than being asked about later, by another user. huji—TALK 13:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

 Approved. Edits look fairly straight and correct. Stick to 4EPM and you'll be fine. — E ^talk_bots 21:32, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.