Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JetBot

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by operator.

JetBot

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Jet123

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic, but supervised

Programming Language(s): AWB & Python

Function Summary: Anything, like cleaning vandalism, but supervised

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Continuous

Edit rate requested: 10 edits per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):

Function Details: The bot can do anything to aid Wikipedia and cleanup vandalism.

Discussion

• Do you have any tasks a bit more specific to propose? Gimmetrow 02:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • JetBot's task is to cleanup vandalism. Jet123 02:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism can't be cleaned up using AWB, as it doesn't have such a function. Are you going to be manually reverting the vandalism under this bot account? Martinp23 14:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

• I'm inclinded towards denying this bot. Will give the operator a day or two to refactor if desired.
  1. AWB and python? Are you going to use this bot for two seperate scripts, if so are they related? What will it be doing in AWB?
  2. This bot should have a userpage describing its function and the operators contact information.
  3. This function is too vauge, needs clarification. If this is just a request to use AWB as an editor, it doesn't need to go through here.
  • — xaosflux ^Talk 01:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• I fully agree with Xaosflux, this request is really too vague, and as proved in the past, vague request bring only problems. The user isn't that experienced here, so I feel more sure if one of our BAG check the source to see that it's all right. Snowolf ^(talk) _CON ^COI - 05:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Withdrawn by operator. Operator didn't wanted to run a bot. Jet123 (Talk) 04:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.