Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Legobot 2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by operator.

Legobot 2

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: LegoK^ontribsT^alkM

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually assisted

Programming Language(s): Python using pywikipedia

Function Summary: Moves images to the Wikimedia Commons, that have {{move to commons}} on them.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Whenever I am online

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: There already is a bot that is doing this, User:BotMultichill, (BRFA), this will be using the same code. Currently CAT:COMMONS has over a thousand images needing moving, so it would be faster if there are two bots going at the same time. Commons BRFA located at commons:Commons:Bots/Requests for flags/Legobot 2 LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 04:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

• No objections to a trial once the Commons BRFA is approved, if it's using Multichill's code. —Giggy 10:10, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
• {{BotTrial}} —Giggy 08:12, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}} BJ^Talk 06:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

{{BotExpired}} BJ^Talk 06:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}}

Reopening: I have some new code (here) and have time to work on it now. The commons BRFA was approved. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 08:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Approved for trial (5 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Richard⁰⁶¹² 20:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Just realized that when bugzilla:15227 (adding action=upload to API) is added, it will be easier, so I am putting this on hold untill then. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 00:37, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

That bug has been opened since 2008-08-18, any word from the devs on a timeline? MBisanz ^talk 08:14, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey Legoktm, that bot request could take a while. Should we close this and reopen it if/when the API upload gets implemented? Or do you want to go for it now? – Quadell ^(talk) 13:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded}}

You can close this for now. I will open it again when it gets added to the API. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 23:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, marking it Withdrawn by operator. for now. Anomie⚔ 23:34, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.