Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/WarddrBOT 2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by operator.

WarddrBOT

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Warddr

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s):Python

Function Summary:I would like to run a featured.py bot to add {{Link FA}}.

Edit period(s): Not more than once a month / language

Edit rate requested: 4 or 5 edits/minute

Already has a bot flag NL, RO, FR and I'm requesting on a lot of other wiki sites

Discussion

Would this be to add this tag to en: articles? — xaosflux ^Talk 15:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

If so please cross-post this to Wikipedia talk:Featured articles. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

I don't see a reason to cross-post. Isn't this completely uncontroversial? —METS501 (talk) 16:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, think I just need more scope clarification, will this bot be adding this templat to en: articles that are FA's or to interwiki links to FA's on other projects? — xaosflux ^Talk 04:31, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps a 1 edit demonstation would speak loudest hear. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Basically positive featured.py just adds {{Link FA}} to articles here which are featured in other languages. Warddr, can you please make a few edits to say exactly what you mean? —METS501 (talk) 18:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I'm much clearer now. Approved for trial. Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Trial to be limited to 50 edits. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

The BOT doesn't work very well, this request can be cancelled. - Warddr 18:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Withdrawn by operator. ST47Talk 18:33, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.