Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/A.C. Milan/archive1

A.C. Milan[edit]

It's an excellent article! User:Barbagianni Potente

Support Barbagianni Potente, 8.40, 28 september 2006 (UTC)
Refer to Peer Review This is not an excellent article at all. There are barely any citations and the article is filled with stubs and lists.UberCryxic 13:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Definatly not a featured article. UberCryxic was right when he/she said there were no citations and also when he/she said there were lots of stubs and lists. Daniel10 18:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Definatly NON neutral article and without information about match-fixing scandal of 1980 (Colombo) and 1982 (Farina), similar a Calciopoli. --Dantemateo 20:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per the others. However, I do want to say the article is pretty good: with thorough, in-line citations, I would reconsider. Surely there has been a lot of material written about this subject? It shouldn't be too hard to find sources concerning the history of the club. Mango juice^talk 15:25, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object There are no in-line citations and certain sections should be expanded. -- Underneath-it-All 15:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object for many reasons, but the following are the most pertinent:
- No inline citations, which are especially necessary for where the article discusses controversies.
- The history section is unbalanced and concentrates on the present too much; it is also split into too many small subsections.
- The reserve/youth squads are not notable enough for inclusion, as are details of the therapists/masseurs.
- No criteria given for what makes a former players or coaches "notable" or worthy of inclusion in the list.
- The current UEFA Club ranking is not really relevant to the article. Qwghlm 21:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]