Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Beer/archive1

Beer[edit]

I made this a FA because I noticed that absinthe is a FA and beer is much more compreshensive. Richardkselby 00:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support Richardkselby 00:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object Many short sections, Lambic Beers only has two sentences and needs expanded. See WP:GTL on how to set up everything from 'See also' on down. The index is too long. Also, you made four errors in making the nomination, which I fixed, but that's not why I'm objecting. 01:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlevse (talk • contribs) PS...the World consumption needs a total rework.Rlevse 01:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Too many section-stubs (e.g., Lambic beers, Beer around the world, World consumption), and the history section is too short. Pepsidrinka 01:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. One main objection, but it's a big one. Beer is full of uncited assertions. —D-Rock 02:55, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
CommentThis is a former FA. See the link on the talk page. Rlevse 10:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object - too many short sections, not particularly well-referenced. Ronline ✉ 11:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. It's not ready. Referencing is almost non-existant. Various sections need tidying up and developing. The article is taking shape, and possibly has the bare bones of a good structure, but now needs fleshing out. SilkTork 12:27, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The TOC is overwhelming, many of hte sections are tiny, and it is severely under-referenced. Raul654 21:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The biggest problem I can see is the lack of references - there's too few of them for such a sizeable article. Joffeloff 13:03, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The short sections are rather jarring a read, and there are other stragities - why is skunking mentioned in the intro, for example? May also be somewhat too focused on the States. WilyD 19:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]