Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Eddie Guerrero/archive1

A great man, a great article... Arnemann 16:47, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object and greatly underreferenced. No inline citations, images lack fair use rationale, images such as this need better licensing tags, and the end of the article is all smashed to one side. Pagra shtak 16:56, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per Pagrashtak. —Eternal Equinox | talk 18:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object, no sources.--Fallout boy 06:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. I could forgive the non-use of inline refs, but one obituary is not enough to reference the entire article. At least use notes to refer to the external links if they contact info used to create the article. -- Mgm|^(talk) 12:15, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object It's understandable that multiple referrence are difficult to achieve where an individuals career is clearly controlled by corporate operations that those controlls including copyright and contractual restrictions. What is needed is information about his life outside the ring, more information about his schooling and childhood. Did he have associations with any community organisations. At the moment its an exceptionally professional career profile only Gnangarra 02:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lots of very unreferenced text. Not a single ref on his cause of death? Something like that, that is not widely known or assumed should not be left unref'ed. Staxringold 01:08, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]