Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hurricane Isabel

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 18:32, 22 February 2007.

Hurricane Isabel[edit]

After working on this and its daughter articles for about 3 months, I guess I feel this article now meets the featured criteria. Another user rated it A class, so I went ahead with it. It has complete sourcing throughout the article, comprehensive without going into too much detail (the details are in the daughter articles), it has non-breaking spaces, etc. Comments? Hurricanehink (talk) 20:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well written, well referenced article. Good use of images with appropriate captions. The only flaw I can see is a few missing retrieval dates, which I have no doubt you'll fix. Jay32183 21:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I fixed the problem. In the cite web template, I did Accessdate for a few as opposed to the correct accessdate. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:11, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Now I see no problems. Good work!. Jay32183 21:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yet another well produced hurricane article. Fieari 23:43, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, seems like another solid hurricane article. Good job. Trebor 00:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This will be another "Damnit, Hink, on how many FACs do I have to ask you to write articles on all topics because your blatant pro-hurricane-article bias means so many of them are incredible while so many other articles are not as incredible?" support. -- Kicking222 22:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Heh, thanks. Hurricanehink (talk) 00:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, albeit biasedly, as I was the one who reviewed it as A-Class. And no, Hink, keep writing hurricane articles... Titoxd^(?!?) 18:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Titoxd. Absolutely solid. --Core desat 23:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.