Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Paradox

Paradox[edit]

Article is no longer a featured article

This article is most likely a holdover from the Brilliant Prose days, but God knows why. The article doesn't seem to have any prose at all outside of the lead section, only has one picture, which isn't terribly topically relevant. Should be on featured lists. RyanGerbil10 01:42, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Remove; this is mostly a list, and an unreferenced one at that. —Kirill Lokshin 01:52, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Remove - could be a candidate for featured lists, but it's not a FA.--nixie 04:24, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - it made the transfer from Brilliant Prose to Featured Article with a one to four vote here Wikipedia:Archive/Refreshing brilliant prose - Science#Paradox. --maclean25 04:32, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Remove. As per Kirill Lokshin and nixie (Petaholmes). -Rebelguys2 09:29, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Remove It's not a bad list, as lists go, but that doesn't mean it's an article (in any sense except that the MediaWiki software treats it as such). Sigh. Funnily enough, this is where I first found omnipotence paradox, which after several rounds of cleanup and expansion eventually made FA. Anville 12:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Remove - This certainly isn't up to Featured Article status anymore. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 20:32, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]