Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Radar

Radar[edit]

Article is still a featured article.

I think the radar article no longer meets FA criteria, as it has sections with poor formatting, that are not well written, and merely lists of radar systems. It's no longer the quality that the article was in June 2004 [1] when it became a featured article. I hope that by listing the article here, some knowledgeable editors on this topic will work on the article and get it back to featured quality. --Aude (talk | contribs) 18:41, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- pending a good copyedit. =Nichalp «Talk»= 10:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if - as Nichalp. This needs a proper lead, inline citations and expantion of stub sections into proper sections. If this is done, then keep, otherwise, remove it.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 03:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Needs some work, but not enough for a remove. Inline cites, whilst desirable, are not compulsary, and it is well referenced. Lead definitely needs expansion, though. Batmanand | Talk 10:40, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - this is good enough in my book. I've given it a bit of a copyedit, and expanded the lead slightly, although more input is welcome. I think the main improvement that could be done it to add back a summary "History of" section (there was one in the original FA, now moved to a daughter article). -- ALoan (Talk) 10:09, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, good article and informative. Needs come improvement though. --Ter e nc e Ong 15:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]