Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Rock, Paper, Scissors

Rock, Paper, Scissors[edit]

Article is no longer a featured article.

No references is the real reason this has to be removed. It has a few external links, but many, many unverified statements, most of which I suspect may be unverifiable. I'm not satisified with its completeness or brilliant prose either, but the first objection should suffice. Sorry to see this go: I love the game, but we aren't fooling anyone with the FA tag. Passed a few years ago, would likely not even meet GA muster today. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 16:29, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hold the press, folks. I just assumed you were right, but the article does have several references. There are though still quite a few other problems, so remove. - Taxman ^Talk 16:39, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, as per nomination. --Ragib 18:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per nom; may have been an FA years ago when it was promoted, but certainly not one today. Although not a requirement for FA status, I would like to see more inline referencing. joturn e r 13:48, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove as per nomination. Also, this one's badly formatted, inconsistent in wikimarkup and looks ugly (not that it's a thing that can't be quickly fixed). The very organization, ordering and segmentation are badly done and a major cleanup is required. I wouldn't even name this a good or even fairly OK article in its current state. → Тодор Божинов / Todor Bozhinov → 17:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per nom. Páll ^{(Die pienk olifant)} 00:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove Tobyk777 04:37, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, fails FA criteria (lacks inline ciatations). --Ter e nc e Ong 03:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note that inline citations are not required. Referencing is all that is required. joturn e r 01:52, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove. Per nom.Hezzy 20:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]