Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Smile (Brian Wilson album)

Smile (Brian Wilson album)[edit]

Article is no longer a featured article.

The article has absolutely no inline citations. While the "further reading" may have been used as a source, I'm pretty sure that these are not the only sources that can be used for a topic this huge and controversial. The see also and external links sections formatted properly are not properly formatted either. It's a shame because I think that this could be a very good article. Unfortunately, it is not a Featured article without properly identified and formatted footnotes (which appears to be mandatory for today’s feature article acceptance policy, even though this was inducted in 2004). --P.O.N.Y. 04:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove - not because of the absence of inline references/footnotes (there has been considerable debate recently about that topic - see the talk page, where I think the consensus is "not yet") but because of the article has no reference. The absence of references was raised by Taxman on the article's talk page in April 2005. -- ALoan (Talk) 10:15, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove no references and a lack of inline citation H ig hway ^{Rainbow Sneakers} 14:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove no references. Just another star in the night ^{T | @ | C} 19:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove per aloan Zzzzz 21:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove no references --jiy (talk) 00:24, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove - Even "Further reading" barely has any reliable sources. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:40, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remove no references or sources. -- Underneath-it-All 01:48, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]