Wikipedia:Featured article review/1993 Russian constitutional crisis/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 07:42, 19 May 2007.
1993 Russian constitutional crisis[edit]
Review commentary[edit]
- Messages left at User talk:172, Russia and Russian History.LuciferMorgan 20:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very poorly referenced (1c). Pictures do not have fair use rationales (3). Errabee 10:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- And the article is kinda small for an FA. KNewman 05:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The article is not poorly referenced; the citations are just easy to miss. The references are under the section "notes and references" using an older system of footnotes, as this is an old FA drafted back in 2004. Indeed this was one of the first FAs to feature footnotes, if anyone is interested in how Wikipedia has evolved over time. I will update the references to conform to the current system. More citations regarding individual claims in the article can be added on demand by the author. 172 | Talk 05:37, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, numerous WP:MSH issues, in addition to the lack of citations. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:30, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe there are problems with most of the images; this needs to be checked. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I did a real quick fix and removed all the "The"s from the headers, some of the headers may need re-naming. It still has 1c and 3 issues, images need furs. Quadzilla99 02:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe there are problems with most of the images; this needs to be checked. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks for your willingness to update the referencing scheme, User:172. One statement picked at random, just to illustrate what sort of thing needs citation: "Moscow saw what amounted to a spontaneous mass uprising of anti-Yeltsin demonstrators numbering in the tens of thousands marching in the streets resolutely seeking to aid forces defending the parliament building." -Fsotrain09 17:19, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary[edit]
- Suggested FA criteria concerns are citations (1c), and images (3). Marskell 16:49, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 22:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove, 1c. Trebor 14:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.